“moderately significant”

There were moderately significant positive correlations among the scale scores (r DKAS - 20,CODE - D = 0.42, p < 0.001; r DKAS - 20,DAS - D = 0.45, p < 0.001; r DAS - D,CODE - D = 0.52, p < 0.001).

A ∗ p value of ≤0.05 was deemed statistically significant, ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01 was regarded as moderately significant, and ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001 was considered highly statistically significant.

The Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant negative association between the mean μTBS and the nanoleakage data (ρ = -0.683, p < 0.001).

Statistical comparisons were conducted with Student's two‐sided t ‐test as * p < 0.05 (statistically significant), ** p < 0.01 (moderately significant), and *** p < 0.001 (highly significant).

The statistical difference was defined by * p < 0.05 as significant, ** p < 0.01 as moderately significant, and *** p < 0.001 as highly significant, respectively.

Meta-analyses Outcomes The overall outcome of the nine studies ( n = 10 comparisons) showed a moderately significant effect size of g = 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–0.83, P < 0.001) for improvement on mental disorder symptoms at posttest (see Figure 3 ).

Firstly, the heterogeneity was moderately significant in the pooled HRs of OS (I 2 = 72.8%, P < 0.001) and mildly significant for PFS (I 2 = 72%, P = 0.185).

Correlation analysis There was a strongly significant positive correlation between the number of articles produced by countries on CRC and GDP and HDI ( r = 0.726, P < .001; r = 0.658, P < .001, respectively); however, there was a moderately significant correlation of publication on CRC with GDP per capita ( r = 0.711, P < .001). 3.5.

There was a positive and moderately significant relationship between fear of childbirth and neuroticism (r=0.469; p<0.001).

Construct Validity Convergent Validity A moderately significant correlation was found between the PALES and the WHOQOL-BREF environmental ( r = .46) and physical ( r = .31) health domains ( p < .001).

Table 2 shows that eplerinone-treated mice at doses of 8 and 16 mg/kg showed moderately significant ( P ≤ 0.001) and highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001), ( F = 3.9) improvement in transfer latency (TL), respectively, on the day of assessment.

The results of the Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant correlation between COVID-19 precautionary behavior and risk perception ( r = 0. 0.54, p < .001) in addition to a weak significant correlation between knowledge and both risk perceptions and adherence to precautionary behavior ( r = 0.26 and 0.19, P < 0.001, respectively).

Relative to the relationship between FMS ® and hop test, the results show a moderately significant correlation (r=0.48, p < 0.001) between the FMS ® total score and single-leg hop test when performed with the dominant leg.

In the OW/OB groups, ATI values demonstrated a moderately significant positive correlation with skin-to-liver distance ( r s = 0.494, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5 ).

A Student's t -test was performed (* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, moderately significant; *** p < 0.001, highly significant). 3.

The correlations between the four factors were moderately significant ( r = 0.396–0.611, p < 0.001, refer to in Table 7 ), the correlations between each factor and the total were strongly significant ( r = 0.683–0.846, p < 0.001), and the correlations between each factor and the total both for male and female student teachers were strongly significant ( r = 0.672–0.867, p < 0.001).

A moderately significant correlation was observed between cultural competence and the behavioural dimension ( r = 0.448; p < 0.001) and between motivation and the cognitive dimension ( r = 0.310; p < 0.001).

A moderately significant negative correlation was observed for DF-DLF ( r = -0.58; P < 0.001).

There was a moderately significant correlation between Log MAR VA and CS of the drivers (r = -0.361, P < 0.001).

Although Cdc8 is identified as a periodically expressed gene by one of previous studies [ 42 ], it has only moderately significant overall P-value (p-value > 0.001) in its periodical expression patterns according to Cyclebase, and thus was not included in our positive set.

It was found that there was a high level of positive correlation ( r = 0.753, p < 0.001) between the STAIT‐5 and STAI‐Trait and a moderately significant positive correlation ( r = 0.391, p < 0.001) with the BFNE (Table 3 ) (Alpar, 2014 ; Şencan, 2005 ).

There was a moderately significant correlation between total QOL in comparison with caregivers’ educational level and mobility capacity, with R values of 0.54 (p<0.001) and 0.62 (p<0.001), respectively.

A weak significant correlation was found between BDI and mHCL scores ( r = 0.338, P = .007) and between BDI and MDQ scores ( r = 0.258, P = .043), whereas a moderately significant correlation was found between mHCL and MDQ scores ( r = 0.694, P < .001) ( Table 3 ).

LNR demonstrated a moderately significant correlation (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) with FIGO status and a weak association with LVSI (r = 0.29, p = 0.02).

A two-tailed P > .05 was considered statistically non-significant, p < .05 significant, P < .01 moderately significant, and P < .001 highly significant.