Barely Significant
← all phrases

“moderately significant”

2,179 sentences · 2,179 papers · 2,611 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11p>0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Previous evidence suggests these differences could have minor but significant impact on the measurements, especially considering that OCT-MRI correlations are themselves often weakly or moderately significant results. 96 , 97 For instance, as illustrated by Buchanan et al., 97 GM and WM tissue volumes appear larger at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T.
occlusal relationship (0.60), (3) marginal ridges (0.58), (4) alignment and rotations (0.57), (5) overjet (0.38), (6) buccolingual inclinations (0.38), and (7) root angulation (0.25) ( P < 0.05) Cephalometric changes were not suitable as weighting factors for CRE scores of overall cases There were moderately significant correlations between changes in lower incisor inclinations with the total CRE score in 2-phase treatment and orthognathic surgery cases.
Compared to healthy older adults, in the results of Leung's meta-analysis, tDCS poles and CT had a moderately significant effect on WM in patients with Parkinson's with improved executive function and sustained improvement at follow-up after three months ( Lawrence et al., 2017 ).
However, the up- and down-regulated gene sets overlapped in only 4 (up, Fisher test p -value: 0.036) and 2 (down, Fisher test p -value: 0.11) genes ( Figure 4 ), suggesting that in spite of the observed overlaps, which may be moderately significant for the up-regulated, but hardly significant for the down-regulated genes, naphthalene induces rather specific responses in the two tissues.
Furthermore, a Tblastn search against the Tlr sequence seeded with the putative Polinton penton proteins detected moderately significant similarity (E = 3e-04) between the predicted P-9_NVi penton protein and the product of a previously unannotated ORF of 227 codons located between the Tlr genes 7R and 1F [ 27 ].
R 2 coefficients <0.13 were considered non-significant, between 0.13 and 0.26, moderately significant, and >0.26, of significant DIF impact. 23 Results Translation and cultural adaptation The process of translation, back-translation, and review of the back-translation did not show any difficulties.