Barely Significant
← all phrases

“moderately significant”

2,179 sentences · 2,179 papers · 2,611 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11p>0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

moderately significantp = 0.12802.6× alphaqualifiedgold
According to Table 7 , the linear effect of solution pH (A), initial ion concentration (B), and adsorbent dosage (C) was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time (D) linear effect was moderately significant (p = 0.1280) for DS-TiO 2 ; while for OP-TiO 2 the linear adsorbent dosage, and solution pH was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time and initial concentration linear effect was moderately significant.
moderately significantP = 0,2495.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although the regressions for type 1 probes for mean "2 nd -log obs/exp" and mean abundance respectively, are not significant (P = 0,528 and P = 0,995), they are highly significant for type II probes (P = 0,0020 and P = 0,0006) and moderately significant for type III probes (P = 0,249 and P = 0,031.
moderately significantP = 0.3416.8× alphaqualifiedgold
For assessing the effect size of the affective pain-related information, data from authors were obtained from only 3 studies, which were found to be moderately significant (g = 0.48, 95% CI [0.23, 0.72], I 2 = 7.1%, P = 0.341) (Appendix E, available as supplemental digital content at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B793 ). 3.5.1.
moderately significantP = 0.63612.7× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed that alcohol consumption (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI = 0.96–2.44; P = 0.068) was moderately significant, while liver cirrhosis (AOR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.22–2.52; P = 0.636) and HCV infection (AOR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.11–2.05; P = 0.329) were not significantly associated with the development of CCA.
To better understand the association between uncharacteristically low control allele frequencies and large ORs observed in some DRD2 association studies and to characterize an overall, meta-analytically significant association, we grouped the studies as highly significant (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.25-2.14), moderately significant (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.32), or nonsignificant (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96-1.23).
Discussion When predicting the occurrence of VCF after radiotherapy based on a SINS score of 7 points in patients with spinal metastases, the accuracy of the tool was moderately significant (AUC, 0.776), and the interobserver reliability showed substantial agreement ( κ = 0.799).