“moderately significant”

There a moderately significant negative relationship between (x = 23.08, ss = 18.10) and psychological resilience (x = 23.49, ss = 6.12) ( r =-.39, p <.01).

Nonetheless, the GSH/GSSG ratio was positively impacted by the treatments containing extracts, with TS being moderately significant (** p < 0.01 vs. control group).

There was a moderately significant negative correlation between body appreciation and depression ( r = −0.51, p <0.01).

A highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in total sperm motility was observed in groups treated with low and high doses (40 and 60 mg/kg) of valsartan and a high dose (0.05 mg/kg) of pramipexole; among them, valsartan at 40 mg/kg had the peak value (71.55 ± 0.7), whereas the testosterone-treated group showed moderately significant ( p < 0.01) reduction in total sperm motility as compared to control values.

Pooled findings indicated that studies conducted in the home had a moderately significant pooled effect size (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI [−0.62 to −0.14], p < .01), and the effect size of studies conducted in an outpatient setting did not reach statistical significance (SMD = −0.25, 95% CI [−0.53 to 0.04], p = ns ).

When exploring subgroups (divided by mechanism of action), 5 trials of dopamine reuptake inhibitors did not show a significant effect on cognition, whereas 12 monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) inhibitor trials showed a moderately significant positive effect (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.90, P = 0.01; I 2 = 84%).

In correlation analyses, all variables are positively and moderately significant with each other ( r = 0.396–0.551, p < 0.01).

Moderately significant heterogeneity among articles was detected ( I 2 = 50%, P < 0.01).

Furthermore, a moderately significant positive correlation was detected between information disclosure behaviour and both perceived control ( r = 0.37; p 0.01) and perceived benefits ( r = 0.52; p < 0.01).

The difference was considered significant if p < 0.05, moderately significant if p < 0.01, and highly significant if p < 0.001. 3.

In another study, 27 it was moderately significant ( r : 0.47, P < .01); a moderate and significant ( r : 0.41, P < .01) correlation was reported in the same direction with the HAD-depression scale. 27 In other studies, the correlation of PAT with other applied scales ranged from 0.16 to 0.69. 12 , 26 - 28 The correlation of Family Structure and Resources subdimensions was not compared with other scales in other studies.

The effect of social barriers is moderately significant with (t- value = 1.8749) and (β=0.1063, p < 0.01) thus hypothesis H1 got accepted.

When compared to the disease control group, the results of the normal control and treatment groups were marked as highly significant (***p < 0.001), moderately significant (**p < 0.01), and significant (*p < 0.05).

Pearson’s correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant correlation between the knowledge test and attitude scale: r = 0.379, p < 0.01.

P-value: 0.05<P<0.10 was taken as suggestive significant, P-value: 0.01<P<0.05 as moderately significant, and P-value: P<0.01 as strongly significant.

The acquired data show a moderately significant correlation between the two factors ( P < 0.01).

In group A, the AVSI showed a moderately significant positive correlation with the PEP-Cobb ( r = 0.682, p = 0.01).

Colour intensity reflects statistical significance: deep pink for highly significant (p < 0.001), pink for moderately significant (p < 0.01), pale pink for marginally significant (p < 0.05), and grey for insufficient sample size to perform accurate analysis.

Moderately significant (P < 0.01) variations were also observed in the abundance of M0 macrophages and helper follicular T cells between the two groups.

In the South zone populations, 5 out of 10 loci showed levels of departure from HWE, with CsM48497 being moderately significant ( P < 0.01) and four markers ( CsM12479 , CsM92789 , CsM30177 , and CsM37073 ) being least significant ( P < 0.005).

Altogether, the seasonal variation of PC was moderately significant between June and August ( p < 0.010) but the difference between individuals was clearer ( p < 0.001).

These results were considered moderately significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.0001. 3 Results 3.1 Effect on body weight There was an insignificant difference in body weight in all groups in contrast to normal control before administering HFD.

Specifically, the 9GE_0.1KH formulation shows a moderately significant difference compared to 9GE formulations, with the two asterisks ** ( p < 0.01) indicating a significant reduction in the WVTR between 9GE_0.1KH and 9GE with the addition of KH.

Statistically moderately significant values, with P > 0.01 and P ≤ 0.05 are noted in the MD values of 43 ( P = 0.024) and 46 ( P = 0.017), respectively.

muricata juice alone or incombination with BV showed a low significant decrease ( P <0.05) in the serum-NFκB levels, while offspring of the BV-treated group showed a moderately significant decrease ( P <0.01) NFκB compared to the MNU-only group ( Figure 6B ).