“moderately significant”

By the same token, high IAS total scores were associated with high scores on TAS-20 and with high scores on two components of TAS-20, “difficulty identifying feelings” and “difficulty describing feelings.” The results from the regression analysis showed that Interoception was a moderately significant predictor of Alexithymia, explaining 13% of the variance (beta = 0.37, p < 0.001).

Meta-analyses Outcomes The overall outcome of the nine studies ( n = 10 comparisons) showed a moderately significant effect size of g = 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–0.83, P < 0.001) for improvement on mental disorder symptoms at posttest (see Figure 3 ).

A two-tailed P > .05 was considered statistically non-significant, p < .05 significant, P < .01 moderately significant, and P < .001 highly significant.

A positive and moderately significant relationship was detected between the participants’ HEI-2015 total score and DDS score according to TUBER ( r = 0.655; p < 0.001).

Results The three moderately significant values of Spearman's rank correlation to GPRs were 0.508 ( p < 0.001), 0.445 ( p < 0.001), and −0.416 ( p < 0.001) for proposed metric LAAM, the ratio of the average aperture area over jaw area (AAJA) and index of modulation, respectively.

Correlation analysis There was a strongly significant positive correlation between the number of articles produced by countries on CRC and GDP and HDI ( r = 0.726, P < .001; r = 0.658, P < .001, respectively); however, there was a moderately significant correlation of publication on CRC with GDP per capita ( r = 0.711, P < .001). 3.5.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed by using Student’s two-tailed t -test with statistical significance assigned at * P < 0.05 (significant), ** P < 0.01 (moderately significant), and *** P < 0.001 (highly significant).

The effect of the labels was displayed as colour maps of statistical significance using two colours, with yellow indicating highly significant results (p-value < 0.001) and green showing moderately significant or insignificant results (p-value ≥ 0.001).

Statistical difference was defined by * p < 0.05 as significant, ** p < 0.01 as moderately significant, and *** p < 0.001 as highly significant, respectively.

The significance of the correlation was interpreted based on the p -value as follows: p ≥ 0.05 NS , not significant trend; 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, weakly significant; 0.005 ≤ p < 0.01, mildly significant; 0.001 ≤ p < 0.005, moderately significant; p < 0.001, strongly significant.

Interestingly, both Procrustes and Mantel analyses identified a moderately significant relationship between the two datasets (Procrustes correlation = 0.73, p = 0.001 and Mantel test r = 0.69, p = 0.001), suggesting both communities influence each other during regeneration.

According to the correlation analysis, there is a negative, weakly significant relationship between SHSE and age ( r = −0.19, p < 0.001); with THLS‐SF, it is negative, moderately significant ( r = −0.33, p < 0.001).

Construct Validity Convergent Validity A moderately significant correlation was found between the PALES and the WHOQOL-BREF environmental ( r = .46) and physical ( r = .31) health domains ( p < .001).

Interestingly, our study also demonstrated that there was a moderately significant correlation between the expression levels of HO-1 and CD163 in TAMs with a Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.536 ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

Correlations between variables In this study, antenatal depression was found to have a moderately significant positive correlation with pregnancy stress (r=.52, p <.001), a moderately significant negative correlation with self-esteem (r=–.49, p <.001), and a slightly significant negative correlation with social support (r=–.24, p =.001).

The statistical significances in this work were analyzed via a two-sided Student’s t -test using the software SPSS 20 statistics (version 26.0), n.s., not significant; * P < 0.05, significant; ** P < 0.01, moderately significant; *** P < 0.001, highly significant.

The Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant negative association between the mean μTBS and the nanoleakage data (ρ = -0.683, p < 0.001).

Overall, combining pre- and post-test data showed a moderately significant correlation (r = 0.373, p < 0.001), suggesting that participants with higher knowledge consistently displayed more positive attitudes, particularly after the educational program.

A ∗ p value of ≤0.05 was deemed statistically significant, ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01 was regarded as moderately significant, and ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001 was considered highly statistically significant.

In addition, the results of that study indicated that the estimated VO2max was a moderately significant predictor of Astrand submaximal VO2max (r = 0.688, p < 0.001).

There were moderately significant interactions between age and BMI in both men and women (r = 0.35; p < 0.001 and r = 0.38; p < 0.001, respectively).

Subset analysis indicated that the increase of RNR treated by C-PEI was highly significant compared with the sham group (P<0.001), moderately significant compared with the 2 mL ethanol group (P=0.048), but not significant compared with the low PTX dose group (P=0.307).

Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test with statistical significance assigned at ** p < 0.01 (moderately significant) and *** p < 0.001 (highly significant).

* P < 0.05 (significant), ** P < 0.01 (moderately significant) and *** P < 0.001 (highly significant).

There was a moderately significant correlation between depressive symptoms and EDSS score (rs(56) = 0.45, p < 0.001).