Barely Significant
← all phrases

“mildly significant”

205 sentences · 205 papers · 269 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

mildly significantqualifiedgold
The non-significant or only mildly significant effects of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\text {NI}}_{ijt-1}$$\end{document} NI i j t
mildly significantqualifiedgold
Concerning the RFT metric, although several mildly significant differences were found in HCs vs. patients (visual scores from 1 to 3), doubtful subjects or patients with scores >1 (panel C in Figure 2 and Figure 3 showing wide overlap) in the ROC curve analysis revealed too low a sensitivity (50% for the female group, 38% for the male group) for RFT to be considered a useful index for distinguishing HC from CA subjects.
mildly significantqualifiedgold
Besides gyrA and parC , which passed our p -value cut off (5.21 × 10 −7 ), we could find mutations in less-studied genes involved in modifying target enzymes, such as gyrB and parE , as well as in the genes involved in alterations of permeation, such as acrB , ompC , mdtK ( norE ), and mdfA , which did not pass our p -value cutoff but were mildly significant ( p -value around 5 × 10 −3 ).
mildly significantqualifiedgold
Higher risk of miscarriage and retarded fetal growth in mothers of homosexual offspring and maternal thyroid dysfunction Many studies have investigated associations among birth weight, sexual orientation and sibship status, 31-33 and some mildly significant results for males have been reported.
mildly significantqualifiedgold
Discrepancies are most likely due to PCR amplification biases from primer binding, but these biases are small and do not impact on the detection of significant taxa, or even mildly significant taxa, because there is sufficient coverage to ascertain the range of taxa in a sample, which is evidenced by the species accumulation plot ( Fig. 2 ).
mildly significantqualifiedgold
Notably, we observed a mildly significant difference in basophil percentage between pSLE patients with mild–moderate disease activity and those with high or very high disease activity based on SLEDAI (0.28 ± 0.19% vs. 0.11 ± 0.11%, respectively; p = 0.0451), as shown in Figure 3 B; a similar finding was not evident for JIA patients, based on JADAS-27 ( Figure 3 C).