“mildly significant”

However, there was a mildly significant benefit for the 150 mg bd arm (P = 0.05).

Mildly significant ( P < 0.05) enhancing effects of marigold seed oil (61.3% calendic acid) were observed on both keratinocyte and fibroblast proliferation after 48 and 72 h at the concentrations of 0.15% and 0.10%.

There was a similar pattern of effect when cells were immunostained with Ab109115 , although this was only mildly significant in the N/P ratio for Hdh Q7/7 cells (p<0.05; S6 Fig ).

The ∆ exoA strain displayed a mildly significant ( p < 0.05 cefsulodin and ampicillin, p < 0.0005 meropenem) increase in sensitivity to all three antibiotics compared with WT, as determined by a disk diffusion assay, but this does not fully explain the hypersensitivity of chvG or chvI deletion mutants ( Figure 6B ).

Although some pristane-treated KO animals developed hypergammaglobulinemia of the IgG1 isotype, the majority of animals failed to do so such that although the difference between pristane-treated WT and KO animals was mildly significant (P < 0.05), the difference between PBS- and pristane-treated KO animals was not (P = NS; Fig.

14,15 In the comparison of MMSE scores between the presence and absence in persecution delusion, the mildly significant difference of MMSE scores was shown ( p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

Age was a mildly significant risk factor for increased ABI ( β = 0.13, p < 0.05).

While we found a mildly significant difference between the 22 FM patients with tinnitus and the 25 FM patients without tinnitus with regard to SSS (p=0.051), there were no statistical differences in demographics and clinical variables between the two groups (as shown in Table 2 ).

Mental health Sense of coherence showed a mildly significant increase from 2013 to 2017 ( d = 8.5 points, p = 0.057) (Table 2 ).

We also found the median differences in mortality to be mildly significant (difference = 0.79, p = 0.0640) based on procalcitonin values.

By multivariate analysis, the mean ER ( P =0.040) and PR ( P =0.031) levels, tumour grade ( P <0.0001) and DNA ploidy ( P =0.0021) were independently associated with age, after controlling for race, T and N stages, tumour size and grade, whereas the KI was not significant ( P =0.469) and p53 was mildly significant ( P =0.064).

The χ 2 test shows that the first projection direction is significant ( p = 0.000144), and the second direction is mildly significant ( p = 0.066), while the other directions are not significant ( p > 0.30).

After adjusted for the covariates in a multivariable analysis, results are given in Table 4 , it was found that age group 60–69 highly significant for Bailey County and mildly significant ( p = 0.067) for the participants in Cochran and Parmer Counties.

A similar trend was seen in the inhouse data but the result was only mildly significant (p-value=0.07) ( Figure 3E , Supplementary Figure S2A ).

Enrichment, if modest, was observed in four out of five cases, and was mildly significant when considering the data collectively ( p -value = 0.07). miR-218/218ab, the only miRNA family that was over-represented in many cell types (10 of 15), yielded a 1.25-fold significant enrichment ( p -value = 0.028).

One-way ANOVA showed that anhedonic rats had a mildly significant trend of enhanced freezing behavior during the pretrauma habituation to the WAZM (F (3,41) =2.5, P =0.072; Figure 7a ).

Typhi infection in the univariate analysis, although the use of stone spout water was only mildly significant in the multivariate model (AOR: 4.17, 95%CI: 0.9–20.5, p = 0.078).

A mildly significant difference in MCMS between time was found ( p = 0.08).

RESULTS CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN EEG-BASED VIGILANCE SCORE Among participants in the “rest” group, the difference in mean vigilance score between the baseline and the 15-minute rest scans was found to be mildly significant ( M = 1.12, SD = 0.02 in the 5-minute scan; M = 1.13, SD = 0.02 in the 15-minute scan; t (14) = -1.86, p = 0.084).

A simple linear regression was carried out considering only openness as a predictor variable for reaction time and found mildly significant F (1, 111) = 2.889, p = .092, R 2 = .025, that is 2.5% of the reaction time variance can be explained by openness when considering together the conditions Humans and AI.

Chronic lung disease is only mildly significant ( P < .10).

Because no significant heterogeneity was observed in analysis of GSTM1 (P = 0.22 and I 2 = 41%), the fixed-effect model was used; because mildly significant heterogeneity was observed in analysis of GSTT1 (P = 0.10, I 2 = 57%), the random-effect model was used.

(ii) Variable-centered approach To determine factors independently associated with the intention to receive the third COVID-19 vaccine dose among the vaccinated subgroup, we fitted an initial multivariate logistic regression model to the data in which mildly significant ( p -value < 0.1) variables from the univariate analysis were included.

Although gender only had a mildly significant effect on individual mindset measures ( p < 0.1 level) it showed a significant main effect on the total mindset score, F (1, 108) = 13.22, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.11, indicating a moderate gender-based difference in overall mindset.

A mildly significant ( p = 0.11) low survival was observed for premenopausal patients when compared to postmenopausal patients ( Figure 1A ).