“marginally nonsignificant”

The test for relaxation of selection and purifying selection on the neural crest genes revealed one gene with significant relaxation of selection ( sox10 ), one gene ( kit ) that showed significant intensification of purifying selection on the domesticates, and one gene ( gdnf ) that showed marginally nonsignificant (p = 0.061) evidence for purifying selection on domesticates.

We found that EDN3 was overexpressed in the ovary of dark comb layers ( P = 0.041, ∼2.5-fold increase), suggesting that the genomic duplication close to the EDN3 gene act as an enhancer in regulating the function, whereas an approximate twofold decrease was observed in the expression of BMP7 in the ovary of dark comb layers, but the difference is marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.061).

simulans , although the result was marginally nonsignificant (χ 1 2 = 3.51, p = .061).

We first compared the number of Luria broth (LB)-culturable bacteria found in the midgut of either sugar-fed control and CTL4 null mosquitoes, and the results showed a marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.0612) increased bacterial load in CTL4-deficient mosquitoes ( Fig 6A ).

Changes in CCFA showed a marginally nonsignificant increase at one month (β = 0.97, 95% CI: −0.05–1.98, p = 0.062), which then reached statistical significance by the second month (β = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.31–2.35, p = 0.011), with a marked increase at three months (β = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.84–3.87, p < 0.001) and four months (β = 3.86, 95% CI: 2.84–4.88, p < 0.001).

Comparing time spent near infected waxworms across all 3 infection stages, there was a marginally nonsignificant effect in which beetles spent more time in the target circle with 3-day infected waxworms compared with that spent with days 5 and 7 (MCMCglmm; P = 0.062).

Specifically, rearing temperature had a marginally nonsignificant ( F 1,18.441 = 3.902, p = .063) effect in a mixed effects model (with replicate as the random effect) that also included the nonsignificant effect of source population and the highly significant effect of body size (Table S5 ).

A marginally nonsignificant (OR = 0.31, CI 95 : 0.08–1.02, p = 0.063) effect was observed for the -a/aa with AS group.

The difference between the apoB–to–apoA-I ratio was significantly greater between diabetic and nondiabetic women than between the comparable groups of men ( P = 0.0045), whereas these same differences in total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio were marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.063) in this data.

In CHU, the difference in mAIc values between males ( n = 18) and females ( n = 14) were marginally nonsignificant ( Z = 1.862, p = .063), while not significant ( p > .05) for all the other locations.

The median age at diagnosis was higher in the RI-refractory group (58 years) compared with the RI-responsive group (51 years), but this difference was marginally nonsignificant (p=.063).

This general pattern held for SVL at 12 days also, although here, the competitor origin and population origin interaction was marginally nonsignificant ( F 1,1197 = 3.45, p = 0.063).

The interaction with population was nonsignificant for both linear and quadratic terms for all the fitness components, with a marginally nonsignificant interaction between population and the quadratic terms for the rate of nonpredation (Figure 4B ; P = 0.064).

51 The evaluation regarding a correlation between the frequency of alcohol consumption and the current EDSS score showed a significant negative correlation in the C old group, while for the LOMS group the negative correlation was marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.064).

Repeated measures analyses of covariance showed a marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.064) group by time interaction in the PSQI total score, but it was significant for the “subjective sleep quality” and “sleep latency” items, favoring Qigong exercise.

3 ) (ANOVA; plasmid main effect, F 1,40 = 7.438; P = 0.009435) and was reduced by the presence of Hg(II) in the media (mercury main effect, F 1,40 = 5.727; P = 0.02149), while the interaction of these factors was marginally nonsignificant (plasmid-mercury interaction, F 1,40 = 3.616; P = 0.06443).

3.6 (F) Male body size Selection regime had a marginally nonsignificant effect on male wing length (Gaussian data distribution: χ 1 2 = 3.40, p = .065, n = 398) which was used as a proxy for male body size.

Asymptomatic At‐Risk patients showed significant improvements on the RUDAS and Story Recall at all dosage levels (except 100 mg TDS was marginally nonsignificant on story recall p = 0.065).

In the third year of our field experiment, there was a marginally nonsignificant interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus addition on biomass production ( F 1,20 = 3.8, p = .065) and plant species richness ( F 1,20 = 3.7, p = .069) (Table S6 ).

However, there was a marginally nonsignificant difference between the sexes in initial weight (LME; χ 2 = 3.38; p = .066) and a significant effect of sex on initial length (LME; χ 2 = 4.75; p = .029), with females being slightly larger than males (mean weight (g) ± SE : females 0.43 ± 0.02; males 0.38 ± 0.02; mean length (mm) ± SE : females 34.20 ± 0.64; males 32.58 ± 0.58).

There was a significant latitude‐by‐photoperiod interaction for development time ( P = 0.009, F 1:2.48 = 56.7) and a marginally nonsignificant interaction for body mass ( P = 0.066, F 1:2.52 = 9.70), signifying genetic divergence along the direction of multivariate plasticity and local adaptation in the use of photoperiodic cues to program development (Supplementary Information 5).

These effects were qualitatively similar when we included soil temperature or air temperature in place of soil-surface temperature in the model, though the effect became marginally nonsignificant when we replaced temperature with elevation in the model (p = 0.066; Supplementary file 1b ; Figure 3—figure supplement 2 ).

By contrast, the A1 model showed only a weak effect— abs_avg_vec_x was marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.067 ), whereas active_ratio remained significant ( P < 0.0001 ) but with much lower explanatory power ( R 2 = 0.008 , F ( 2 , 2033 ) = 8.56 , P < 0.001 ).

Likewise, when compared to the ConvNeXt backbone, the proposed method demonstrated statistically significant improvements in MLD1 ( p = 0.024) and MLD3 ( p = 0.038), while achieving a strong yet marginally nonsignificant advantage in MLD2 ( p = 0.067).

Although bird abundance was higher in polyculture than monoculture, it was marginally nonsignificant ( F 1,119 = 3.43; p = .067) between polyculture sites ( x ̄ = 6.76 birds) and monoculture sites ( x ̄ = 4.93 birds).