“marginally nonsignificant”

Planned contrasts revealed that the fist above head expression significantly differed (except marginally nonsignificant for the calm-excited measure; p = 0.055; η p 2 = 0 . 24 ) from the neutral condition on all the dependent measures (all η p 2 > 0.80).

When analyzed by treatment group, at pupil diameters of 3 mm, the vectorial analysis revealed a statistically significant change in the J 45 component for the mineral oil + HP-Guar group (−0.009 ± 0.029 D, p = 0.039), while the change in J 0 was marginally nonsignificant (+0.007 ± 0.027 D, p = 0.055).

living alone) (B = 0.049; p = 0.019), current smoking (B = 0.087; p < 0.001), poor sleep (B = 0.052; p = 0.001), use of statins (B = −0.052; p = 0.002) and lower serum adiponectin level (B = −0.001; p = 0.039) whereas association of metabolic syndrome was marginally nonsignificant (B = 0.029; p = 0.055).

This path analysis also revealed marginally nonsignificant effects of paternal lifespan on sons’ lifespan ( z = 1.920, p = 0.055), as well as marginally nonsignificant indirect effects of PAC on sons’ lifespans via the effect of paternal lifespan ( z = 1.776, p = 0.076).

The correlation between HS2ST1 expression and that of CD274 (also known as PD-L1) was marginally nonsignificant (rho = 0.099, P = 0.0552).

A marginally nonsignificant supplementation-by-time interaction ( P = 0.056) and significant main effects of supplementation ( P < 0.001) and time ( P = 0.034) in soleus muscle FI were found ( Figure 2 ).

In model 2, these associations remained statistically significant or stronger, except for the association of apoAI with arteriolar tortuosity index, which became marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.056), and the association of apoB with arteriolar tortuosity index, which showed no association ( Tables 1 and 2 ).

Addition of SAC resulted in a marginally nonsignificant improvement in model fit (inclusion of column and row processes: χ 2 (3) = 7.58, P = 0.056) and explained less than 3% of the variance, and this came mostly from the residual variance with very little change in heritability ( Table 2 ; Fig. 3D ).

In PHA‐treated tissue, the total number of cells detected depended significantly on time after stimulation (GLM; significant term time: MAM3 in Table 1 ), with a significant difference in total cellular infiltration (compared with the control at time point 0) observable 12, 24, 48, and 72 h poststimulation (Tukey test; P < 0.020 in all cases), the difference at 3 h poststimulation being marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.056).

This difference was statistically significant for patients with CNS-PNET (χ 2 , P < 0.05) and marginally nonsignificant for primary intraspinal EES/pPNET patients (χ 2 , P = 0.056).

The mean score of social condition subscale in traditional lecture group was slightly less than those in TBL group, provided a marginally nonsignificant differences (19.47 vs. 21.14, P = 0.056).

The source ootheca had a marginally nonsignificant influence on relative redness for late fourth instars ( F 2,44 = 3.06, p = 0.057) but a strong influence for adults ( F 2,23 = 7.84, p = 0.0025, Figure A10 ).

Exclusion of locus RlatCa27 from the analysis resulted in a marginally nonsignificant trend ( P = 0.057).

In seven cases, there were significant negative correlations between telomere repeat copy number and flowering time ( ρ = −0.123 to −0.169, P < 0.008 to 0.045; see Figure 6 for one example), one was marginally nonsignificant ( ρ = −0.130, P < 0.057), and one still appeared negative but was nonsignificant ( ρ = −0.057, P < 0.43; see Supplemental Table 3 ).

Centroid size has a marginally nonsignificant effect on RS1 ( z = 1.90, P = 0.057).

Deaf male vocalizers also produced relatively more tonal (higher HNR) pain vocalizations ( F 1,58 = 5.8, p = 0.019), and while differences in amplitude were marginally nonsignificant (mean AMP, F 1,58 = 3.8, p = 0.057), the pain vocalizations of deaf male vocalizers were slightly quieter then were those of male controls (Supplementary Table 8 ).

This downward trend, modeled via ARIMA (0,1,0), was marginally nonsignificant in the historical series ( p = 0.057).

In the primary analysis, the association of HER2 expression by 21-gene assay with trastuzumab benefit was marginally nonsignificant (nonlinear p = 0.057).

There was a marginally nonsignificant positive correlation between r and approach in adult female dyads ( r = 0.197, P = 0.057, Table 4 , Figure 3A - 3C ).

Retinopathy showed a marginally nonsignificant association with wound healing (p = 0.057).

In univariate models, baseline eGFR (HR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.95 − 0.98, p < 0.001), baseline UPCR (HR = 1.43, 95%CI = 1.12 − 1.81, p = 0.004), triglycerides (HR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.00 − 1.01, p = 0.007), and serum albumin (HR = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.16 − 0.79, p = 0.011) were the only factors associated with the study outcome, whereas the association with duration of T2DM was marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.057).

For mean deposition, the medium contrast was marginally nonsignificant (df = 26, t = 1.99, p = 0.0574, Cohen's d = 0.88), with a large effect size, and nonsignificant for small and large (Appendix S1 : Table S1 b,c).

elegans ( P = 0.63, Spearman's rank correlation) and marginally nonsignificant for C. briggsae ( P = 0.058).

( 2009 ), the Spearman rank correlation between land use intensity and carbaryl tolerance (represented by the EC 50 ) in the original populations shows a marginally nonsignificant positive association ( r = 0.739; P = 0.058; Fig. 2 A).

Four out of five of the lead replicated MTAG signals were also significant in the original delirium GWAMA (Supplementary Table 3 ), with rs2279590 ( CLU gene) being marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.058).