Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally nonsignificant”

449 sentences · 449 papers · 520 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.096

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally nonsignificantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
While we found no effect of prey size or size change on predator initial response, we found a possible trend that apparent size change from small (2 wings visible) to large (4 wings visible) increases the latency to return to the prey after the moving display, although this effect was marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.051).
marginally nonsignificantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
No significant change in the serum IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, or TNF- α level occurred over time, although marginally nonsignificant higher TNF- α levels were observed at 24 h after AP in the nontreatment ( p = 0.051 versus 2 and 12 h after AP) and saline ( p = 0.060 versus 12 h after AP) groups ( Figure 1(d) ). 3.2.
marginally nonsignificantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
There was a marginally nonsignificant interaction between age and condition, χ 2 (1) = 3.80, p = 0.051: Age had no significant effect in the solo condition, χ 2 (1) = 0.09, p = 0.761, but a marginal negative effect in the collaboration condition, χ 2 (1) = 3.40, p = 0.065, indicating that the condition effect in our original analysis was more strongly driven by younger children.
marginally nonsignificantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The adult activity partitions for PIN and VAOP were significant for analyses of the gene topologies ( P = 0.016 and 0.039, respectively) and were marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.051 and 0.056, respectively) for analyses of the species topologies, yet the adult activity partitions were the best fits for PIN and VAOP across both sets of topologies.
marginally nonsignificantp = .0521.0× alphagold
However, a marginally nonsignificant Kruskal–Wallis rank‐sum test (χ 2 10 = 18.17, p = .052) and Dunn's test ( Table S3 ) revealed that the difference of invasion impact was not significant among sites. 3.3 Invasibility and genetic diversity The estimated invasibility was significantly different in at least one site as indicated by a Kruskal–Wallis test (χ 2 10 = 22.29, p = .014).
marginally nonsignificantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Empirical cumulative distribution function analysis revealed that the probability that the circular and linear viral genome GC skew values were from different distributions was significant at 50% identity ( p = 0.017), somewhat nonsignificant at 70% identity ( p = 0.111), nonsignificant at 95% identity ( p = 0.625), and only marginally nonsignificant prior to dereplication ( p = 0.052).
marginally nonsignificantp = .0521.0× alphagold
Participants became faster at completing the VAAST on their second attempt (post-intervention) [ t( 50) = 9.70, p < .001, d = 1.36] and correspondingly there was a marginally nonsignificant reduction in their time estimates [ t( 50) = 1.99, p = .052, d = 0.28].
marginally nonsignificantp = 0.05271.1× alphagold
Results Respiration through complexes I and II State 3 (OXPHOS) respiration ( Figure 2A ) tended to increase between 25 °C and 40 °C, although this effect was marginally nonsignificant (main effect of temperature on respiration: F [3,16] = 3.179, p = 0.0527).