“marginally nonsignificant”

We found significant or marginally nonsignificant male preference for the more attractive (as determined in active female assays) female genotype in four out of five tested female comparisons ( Fig. 3b ) and one comparison yielded no significant preference for either female.

Of note, this association became marginally nonsignificant after adjustment for BMI.

Overrepresentation of mutations in the CHEK2 gene in OC patients in this study was marginally nonsignificant in contrast to our previous report where we identified moderately increased OC risk for CHEK2 mutation carriers [ 27 ].

Although the differences were marginally nonsignificant, there was a tendency for nurses to be less friendly and relaxed with the intervention group, inhibit partnership more frequently and have worse relationship quality with intervention patients.

An analogous model, instead using the cost of multiple mating as response, showed a significant positive effect of the harmfulness of male genitalia and a marginally nonsignificant negative effect of bursa size.

All health status variables were statistically significantly higher in women except for moderate depressive symptoms which were marginally nonsignificant. 3.3.

There was no G × E for plasticity of signaling behavior (either on‐ or off‐carcass) in response to the introduction of a rival male, although in both cases the effects were only marginally nonsignificant.

While the midland landraces did outperform the highland landraces by a large margin in the midlands, the lowland maize was as fit as the midland maize (this was marginally nonsignificant).

Women reported being more afraid to visit a doctor than men were (χ 2 (3) = 7.593, p = 0.055), although the result was marginally nonsignificant.

In the southeastern region, there was a tendency for higher adjusted odds for more partners, which was marginally nonsignificant at the two lowest cutpoints.

There was no significant linear component to the effect of Elo rating difference; this relationship was marginally nonsignificant.

The difference between the sexes was significant by a bootstrapping test and marginally nonsignificant by the CMH test ( table 1 ).

However, it may also be due to confounding, as there was a marginally nonsignificant trend for drill scenario by round, with a greater proportion of drills being ILI in later rounds (58% in round 1 to 81% in round 3; p trend = 0.08).

For instance, in the random‐effects model with MD, the summary effect is marginally nonsignificant under MAR, but its CI moves away from zero in the IM analyses as σ λ increases.

Although the difference between live and museum birds was marginally nonsignificant, we categorized data according to state (alive vs. museum) for subsequent statistical analysis.

Examining USDA food group consumption by gender, while the median consumption was higher in boys than in girls for all food groups, the differences were significant for grains, protein foods, and fruits (all p < 0.05), and marginally nonsignificant for dairy, oils, and discretionary foods ( p -values ranged from 0.056 to 0.09).

the 2 forest sites) indicated a marginally nonsignificant difference, with a trend for a higher probability of double-brooding in urban than forest birds ( Table 2 ).

In contrast, XXY females derived from XXY parents showed slightly elevated fecundity and slightly reduced survival relative to XX females ( Fig 2 ; these differences are marginally nonsignificant).

Although the overall ANOVA was marginally nonsignificant, we conducted planned post hoc comparisons, given the exploratory nature of this study.

The global Schoenfeld test P value of 0.0579 suggests a marginally nonsignificant outcome for the overall model, encompassing diabetes, hypertension, SII, and NT‐proBNP (Figure S3 ).

The role of prior experience with parasitism within and between breeding seasons was marginally nonsignificant in Grim et al.

This aligns with the analyses presented in the main text, which found significant linear selection gradients for head length and flagellum length, significant correlational selection between PM and flagellum length and marginally nonsignificant negative linear selection on VCL (see Table 1 in main text).

However, the p value (.053) was slightly above the conventional significance threshold ( p < .05), indicating that the result was marginally nonsignificant.

Our results remained qualitatively and in terms of significance consistent between the models using different trees, except for one polygamy frequency bivariate model with breeding density as a predictor, where we observed a marginally nonsignificant effect instead of a significant effect when using the supertree instead of the consensus tree in the PGLS model: effect of breeding density, estimate −0.23 ± 0.11, P = 0.09, λ = 0.67, R 2 = 0.05).

At Harvard Forest, the effects were marginally nonsignificant, but the slopes were of the same magnitude and direction as at Duke Forest ( Table 1 ).