“marginally nonsignificant”

After adiponectin values were corrected for hemoconcentration, changes in the moderate-intensity group were eliminated and remained elevated only in the high-intensity group at 12 ( P < 0.05) and 24 (marginally nonsignificant, P = 0.09) h of recovery.

In unadjusted models, women who gave birth ≥2 times had 44% lower odds of overweight/obesity than women who only gave birth once (OR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.84; P = 0.005), and women who had never given birth had 40% lower odds of overweight/obesity than women with 1 live birth, but this was marginally nonsignificant (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.07; P = 0.09).

With adjustment for baseline UPCR in Model 4, the hazard ratio for High/High 2-year pattern was still significantly different from the Low/Low pattern (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.42) though the overall type 3 P value testing for differences between all levels of the variable was marginally nonsignificant at P = 0.09.

Higher-dose digital advertising was associated with a marginally nonsignificant increase (46%) in overall campaign awareness regardless of media format ( P =.09).

Consistent with the heterogeneity results, MR-PRESSO excluded outlier variants and estimated a corrected causal estimate that showed a marginally nonsignificant causal effect of GERD on T2D (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.99–1.23], P = 9.00 × 10 −2 ) [Fig. 4 and Supplementary Data 4 ].

brain cancer) was marginally nonsignificant, F (1, 41) = 2.94; p = .094; η 2 = .067.

This difference was marginally nonsignificant after controlling for relevant covariates ( B = -1.57, SE = .93, t( 67 ) = -1.69, p = .095).

Age is a known correlate of NSSI [ 1 , 2 , 26 ] that did not predict the continuation of NSSI in our study (although the odds ratios were only marginally nonsignificant, p < .1, and not substantially smaller than the odds ratios that reached statistical significance).

Generally, if the lowest AICc model retained a marginally nonsignificant predictor (0.05< P -value<0.1) but exhibited a sum of Akaike weights (sw) greater than 50%, it was considered an important model predictor.

Although three of four populations exhibited a similar trend in the distribution of vgll3 genotypes (Figure 2 ), all other comparisons resulted at most in marginally nonsignificant differences (.05 < p < .1) in the genotype distributions of the 1SW or MSW group or between the sexes of a given sea age class (Table 2 ).

Concerning potential associations of patients' age with assessments, few significant and marginally nonsignificant correlations were detected and these were of moderate to low strength (0.31 < rho < 0.41, P < 0.10).

ovata, population differentiation in leaf traits was marginally nonsignificant ( p ≤ 0.1) on the first maximum variance axis (LD1 42.4%, p = 0.081; LD2 21.8%, p = 0.690), whereas in E. pauciflora statistically significant differentiation occurred in two independent directions (LD1 42%, p < 0.001, and LD2 23.4%, p = 0.045) ( Figure 1 ).

This interaction effect was marginally nonsignificant (LM, GSI x treatment: F 2, 19 = 2.552, p = 0.10; Body weight: F 1, 19 = 5.2686, p = 0.03).

For plants, trait and management effects on species‐level network indices were weak with only one marginally nonsignificant ( p ≤ .1) relationship between the trait “amount of pollination reward” and specialization (Table 2 ).

We observed marginally nonsignificant ( p < .1) differences between RG and RO sites for absolute gut size (Table 1 ; Figure 1 ).

Therefore, when encountering marginally nonsignificant interactions (0.05 < p < 0.1), we calculated effect sizes (Pearson r) following McNeil et al.

However, the correlations were only moderate in amplitude, ranging from 0.33 to 0.37, and marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.10, 0.07, and 0.09 for DS1, DS2, and DS3, respectively, Table 2 ).

Regarding the program of study, business students demonstrated significantly higher odds of pharmacological management compared to general science students (Exp( B ) = 3.78, p = 0.03; 95% CI [1.10, 13.05]), while visual arts students showed marginally nonsignificant increased odds (Exp( B ) = 4.44, p = 0.10; 95% CI [0.75, 26.22]).

Although interesting, these results should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in other studies; the subgroup of survivors who were treated within the previous year and experienced employment disruption was small, and the association between employment disruption and financial hardship among this subgroup was only marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.10).

There was a marginally nonsignificant positive relationship between hair and plasma GC ( F = 3.57, df = 7, R 2 = .338, p = .101) and no relationship between hair GC and fecal GCM (F = 1.09, df = 7, R 2 = .134, p = .332).

Using a nonparametric test, we found marginally nonsignificant difference in positive selection pressure between complexes and complex assembly factors (Wilcoxon test W = 1,505, P = 0.1029, Figure 4A ), with respiratory complex experiencing more selection than complex assembly factors.

The content of linoleic acid (C18:2n6c) was numerically lower in the SA group and higher in the PO group; however, this difference was marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.107).

Apiaries treated with chemical treatments (hard and soft) had a mean survival of 52% and those treated with mechanical treatments had a mean survival of 36.6% though this difference was marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.117).

On the other hand, adiponectin concentration was lower among Asians compared to Caucasians, though this difference was marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.12) ( Table 1 , Figure 3 ). 4.

Skin autofluorescence showed a marginally nonsignificant association with low PA (OR = 1.18 [0.96–1.49], p = .13) and no association with ≥5% weight loss in last 5 years (OR = 1.07 [0.82–1.40], p = .61).