“marginally non-significant”

Marginally non-significant quadratic trends were also observed between male age and song frequency bandwidth, and peak trill frequency (Table 1 ), where values for these vocal traits increased in young males, peaked around 6 years, and decreased in late-life.

Proximity prestige was also significantly negatively correlated to degree centrality in two study years, but this correlation was marginally non-significant in 2002 after sequential Bonferroni-correction (with α = 0.017).

The p -value (0.057) highlighted in Table 4 for the intercept (organic diet) indicates that the organic diet was marginally non-significant, suggesting weak evidence that the mean value of the outcome for non-organic products in their diets differed from that with organic products.

Overall tests across all isolates and both phenotypes confirmed genotype-phenotype associations showing significance for all SNPs with the exception of CLIPB4-34473971 , which was marginally non-significant.

The contrast was marginally non-significant after correction ( p (Holm) = 0.068), and requires caution in interpretation. 4.4.2.

There was also a marginally non-significant phylogenetic signal for %C (although K = 0.401 is lower than K = 1 expected for a Brownian Motion random walk).

Our interpretation remains speculative, however, as the effect of larger offspring size under higher population densities was marginally non-significant (Additional file 1 : Figure S2).

Temporal Patterns of MDH Activity in LD and DD Changes in MDH activity over time were significant in LD and marginally non-significant in DD (Table 2 , M5).

Although this association was marginally non-significant in multivariate analysis, combining SARIFA with LVI in a composite variable improved predictive accuracy.

There were many markers showing trends and marginally non-significant differences between CTRL and ASD.

After controlling for these significant effects, we found clear, although marginally non-significant, trend for differences between overall birth-order categories (all siblings of both sexes considered) in their probability of surviving to adulthood, with firstborns being disadvantaged, and lastborns having the best chances of surviving (χ 2 2 = 5.76, p = 0.056; Figure 2a ).

In Vietnam, the adjusted model showed a marginally non-significant twofold increased risk of OW/OB in the highest SES households (‘Better off’) at baseline.

For those intervals that showed a significant or marginally non-significant difference, a series of a posteriori, multiple-comparison (pair-wise) tests were run to identify those bins that were significantly different.

The correlation is marginally non-significant at the conventional 0.05 level, suggesting a possible trend where higher health expenditure may be associated with fewer deaths, but the evidence is not conclusive.

The dN/dS analyses on branches with host–plant shifts (combined or not with environmental shifts) showed more genes with a subset of codons evolving under positive selection (dN/dS > 1) in lineages shifting to a new plant family, although the difference was marginally non-significant for the smallest dataset and highly significant for the second dataset containing more genes (Fig. 4b , Supplementary Fig.

The mean SSS in patients with abnormal prone interpretation (remaining defect) and severely stenotic RCA were 11.74 ± 3.05 for the supine versus 10.95 ± 2.65 for the prone studies and the difference was marginally non-significant (p: 0.012).

The continuity-corrected chi-squared value (χ 2 (1) = 3.375, p = 0.066) revealed a marginally non-significant trend, suggesting that SOD identified fewer DTD cases than LBS.

Although marginally non-significant, the TS fish orientated themselves preferentially to the South–East (mean vector = 115° ± 90°SD; see Fig. 3 ), which resulted in a statistically significant difference between the two datasets, Sun and TS, of 78° (Mardia–Watson–Wheeler test; W = 8.85, P = 0.012).

We define the statistical significance level at 0.05 and refer to results where 0.05 < P < 0.1 as marginally non-significant.