Preliminary analyses performed in a subset of animals (Supplementary Materials) showed a marginally non-significant nonlinear correlation between PhNR amplitude and Aβ42 concentration (Spearman’s ρ = -0.59, p = 0.051).
In adjusted models, LAIB was a marginally non-significant predictor of QoL (p=0.051) (see table 3 ).
The interaction between number format and CRI [ F (1,116) = 0.85, p = 0.359, ηp2 = 0.01] and between number format and education [ F (1,116) = 0.41, p = 0.526, ηp2 = 0.00] did not reach significance, while the interaction between number format and age was marginally non-significant [ F (1,116) = 3.90, p = 0.051, ηp2 = 0.03].
For undersides, ANOVA yielded a marginally non-significant result for the effect of site (F 3,26 = 2.96, P = 0.051), but pairwise comparisons showed that FER, IGL and OBS formed one homogeneous subset, and OBS and IUI another, indicating that biomass at IUI but not OBS was significantly lower than that at the two artificial reefs.
Interestingly, we found a marginally non-significant correlation between the percentage of intrathymic fat and the BMI as surrogate of the body weight (Pearson correlation 0.44, p = 0.051).
The BEI treatment showed a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.051) with FA.
Despite there not being a statistically significant difference between the two groups, this difference could also be classified as marginally non-significant (Mann–Whitney U test, U = 5.5, critical value of U is 5, Z = 1.64, p = 0.051).
Both traits were influence by systematic position within the Tropidurinae lineage (significant phylogenetic signal, see Table 2 ) under most models tested (clutch size exhibited marginally non-significant phylogenetic signal under constant branch lengths, P = 0.051, Table 2 ).
The likelihood ratio test comparing the full and null model revealed that trial had a marginally non-significant effect (χ 2 = 5.943, df = 2, p = 0.051), and attentiveness did not have a significant effect (χ 2 = 2.884, df = 1, p = 0.089) on the elephants' choice to approach the cooperative partner.
However, there was a marginally non-significant correlation between NPI apathy and DAS EmA ( p = 0.051, r = 0.303).
There was a marginally non-significant correlation between the balance point at baseline and state anxiety ratings over time ( r = −0.272, N = 52, p = 0.051) in the intervention group, whereby those with a lower balance point at baseline (i.e. higher negative bias) showed a greater reduction in state anxiety post-training.
However, when PA was the outcome variable, the interaction between psychological capital and perceived stress was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.051).
A marginally non-significant ( p = 0.051) association of CB leptin concentration and weight change was observed.
Similarly, fish from the Upper Florida Keys had higher prevalence of infection with any virus (57.1%) than fish from any other location in the study; however, this relationship was marginally non-significant (Fig. 4 ; Online Resource 1 , Kruskal-Wallis Chi-squared = 16.83, df = 9, P = 0.051).
a marginally non-significant interaction between sex and age (p = 0.051), with anti-KLH nIgM decreasing with age in females.
A similar trend was observed for Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASV) richness, although this difference was marginally non-significant (ANOVA: p = 0.051, F = 3.09; Fig. 5A ).
This association, however, weakens and becomes marginally non-significant in the multivariate model (β = 0.13, p = 0.051), suggesting that gender differences in health behaviors may be influenced by other demographic and health factors.
While deployment status showed no significant effect, gender was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.051) ( Table 5 ). 4.
Begg’s test showed no significant effect (p = 0.532), whereas Egger’s test indicated a marginally non-significant trend toward a small study effect ( p = 0.051), suggesting potential publication bias.
Excluding the Tulbagh sampling location from the AMOVA returned a marginally non-significant partitioning of genetic variation ( Φ ST = 0.022, p = 0.051).
3 ) and brown males where the effect was marginally non-significant (Tukey’s HSD test: p = 0.051; Table S2 , Fig. 3 ).
Based on the findings, the frequency of CC genotype in the placental TP53 -rs1042522 polymorphism was lower in the PE group compared to controls, but the difference was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.051).
Fig 2C presents PC2 score distributions showing a marginally non-significant trend (p = 0.051) toward higher PC2 values in young subjects.
This relationship remained significant in model 1 (OR = 1.584, 95% CI: 1.326 to 1.891, P < 0.0001) and model 2 (OR = 1.385, 95% CI: 1.162 to 1.651, P = 0.001), but was marginally non-significant in the fully adjusted model 3 (OR = 1.218, 95% CI: 0.999 to 1.485, P = 0.051).
Although women had higher mean scores (3.7 ± 1.8) compared to men (3.2 ± 1.3), this difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.052).