Other notable findings include glucose (carbohydrate) with an I 2 of 11% and no significant pleiotropy (Egger intercept p-value = 0.3449), and 1-oleoylglycerophosphocholine (lipid) with I 2 = 7% and a marginally non-significant pleiotropy p-value (Egger intercept p-value = 0.1477).
For the entropy score, differences with TumblinTurk, Pattanaik, Durand, Drago, YeePattanaik, Mertens, Bruce and Liang were not statistically significant (adjusted p = 0.999), and the comparison with Ashikhmin was marginally non-significant (adjusted p = 0.156).
However, in matched CSCLC and pure SCLC patients, there were marginally non-significant differences in OS (median: CSCLC, 10.00 vs. pure SCLC, 9.00 months; P=0.17; Figure 2E ) and LCSS (median: CSCLC, 11.00 vs. pure SCLC, 10.00 months; P=0.66; Figure 2F ).
These simulations were carried out for response variables that showed marginally non-significant (p < 0.2) differences between treatments.
Kruskal–Wallis test revealed marginally non-significant differences among species ( p = 0.212), though notable trends emerged.
Compared to participants in the highest tertile of pulmonary function, those in the lowest had higher risk of arterial stiffness (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.51, 95% CI 1.09–2.10 for FEV 1 and AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22–2.33 for FVC), but the higher risk of PAD was marginally non-significant (AOR 1.64, p = 0.42 for FEV 1 and AOR 1.65, p = 0.24 for FVC).
In the fully adjusted Model 3, Q3 (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–1.00.79.00, P = 0.043) exhibited a significantly negative association with all-cause mortality, whereas Q2 (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.01, P = 0.070) showed a marginally non-significant negative trend, and Q4 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85–1.08, P = 0.493) had no significant association.
The sex effect (Wilks' lambda=0.59; F 8,24 =2.05; P =0.08) was marginally non-significant and the interaction between sex and population (Wilks' lambda=0.78; F 8,24 =0.89; P =0.56) was not significant.
However, post-hoc tests did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups at any measurement time, with p -Values being marginally non-significant ( p -Value = 0.65 in the 12-month measurement and p -Value = 0.56 in the 18-month measurement) ( Table 2 ).
KM analysis for IV CSCLC, IV SCLC and IV NSCLC after PSM After PSM, the mOS and mCSS for patients with IV CSCLC were both 6.00 months, while those for SCLC patients were 5.00 months, there were marginally non-significant differences in OS (P = 0.730; Fig 5A ) and CSS (P = 0.685; Fig 5B ) between IV CSCLC and IV SCLC groups.
When stratum II is also included, the SDR shows a marginally non-significant divergence in the female (female d S : mean = 0.006402, p = 0.89; female d N : mean = 0.004020, p = 0.061; male d S : mean = 0.005052, p = 0.99; male d N : mean = 0.002084, p = 0.94, Mann-Whitney U test relative to the genome) despite the presence of sex-linked markers in this region (Additional File 1 : Fig.
Mean scores of sheltered-site (n = 16) and exposed-site snails (n = 51) differed on RW1 but not on RW2 or RW3, although difference on the latter was marginally non-significant (MANOVA: Box's M, P = 0.894; Wilk's lambda,P<0.001; Levene's test: RW1, P = 0.400; RW2, P = 0.032; RW3, P = 0.250.
940 nm: p = 0.067 (marginally non-significant). 660 nm vs. 810 nm: p = 0.999 (non-significant).
For ABS, however, d N exceeded d S by a factor of two, although the excess of non-synonymous substitutions was marginally non-significant.
Furthermore, the significance of this increase is largely due to the occurrence of high taxon counts in the final two time bins of the Cretaceous (K7 and K8), and the slope becomes marginally non-significant when these time bins are also excluded ( Table 1 ).
5 , 6 , 7 ), although the correlation between taxonomic distinctness and latitude for 16x intertidal assemblages was only marginally non-significant ( Table 2 , Fig. 7a ).
The sampling day also had a marginally non-significant interactive effect with the sampling time (Table 1 ; Online Resource 2).
Rd was comparable in all treatments at Day 35, with a trend for higher values in CAP (−2.12 ± 0.08 versus −1.30 ± 0.03 in HP and −1.24 ± 0.07 in DCAP, all in μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 ), however, at the end of the experiment DCAP showed increased dark respiration compared with HP (−3.23 ± 0.04 and −2.11 respectively, all in μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 ), a difference that was marginally non-significant.
If we conduct a Bonferroni correction, the brain size effect becomes marginally non-significant.
Among intervention types, Taichi (Estimate = 0.35, p = 0.02) showed a significant positive effect compared to Meditation, while Yoga (Estimate = 0.07, p = 0.43) and Qigong (Estimate = 0.19, p = 0.07) had a marginally non-significant positive effect.
aberti chuscensis was marginally non-significant (Table 1 ).
Especially for HDL, a marginally non-significant p for trend does not mean there is no trend, it just looks messier with more uncertainty.
[ 20 ], the difference was marginally non-significant.
Similarly, those having respiratory morbidity had lower mean PEFR as compared to those free from any respiratory morbidity and the difference was marginally non-significant.
ervi under a benign temperature regime [ 18 ], and here we confirm the same trend although this is marginally non-significant (note that this is significant in the supplemental analysis of the proportion of parasitoid mummies; S1 Text , S1 Fig , S1 Table ).