In contrast, even though daughters showed a similar trend to sons, the effect of parental pair group on female nestlings was marginally non-significant (LS-means ± SE, short vs. long parental pair group, -0.376 ± 0.067 versus − 0.209 ± 0.061, F 1,29.8 = 3.39 p = 0.076; Supporting information Table S7).
No statistically significant influences for imagery type were found, although imagery of younger women was only marginally non-significant ( b = 0.008, p = 0.076).
After adjusting for sex and age in Model 2, the association for PM1 remained significant but slightly attenuated (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01–1.14, P = 0.028), whereas PM2.5 became marginally non-significant (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99–1.12, P = 0.076).
Correlation between evenness and other variables We observed a marginally non-significant increase in RUE with increasing evenness at the regional scale (r = 0.47, p = 0.076) ( Fig. 6A ), but this correlation reversed when analyzing the treatment residuals for RUE and evenness instead (r = −0.447, p = 0.096, Fig. 6B ).
Hs-CRP was found to be almost twice higher in the obesity group than in the control/overweight group; however, the difference was found to be marginally non-significant (0.36 vs. 0.20 mg/dL, p = 0.076).
1 ; Supplementary Material S5 ), and there were significant effects of Sex ( t = 2.79, P = 0.0058), Sample site ( t = 2.76, P = 0.0063), Sex × Age ( t = −2.07, P = 0.0396), and a marginally non-significant effect of Age ( t = −1.78, P = 0.0762) with older mice tending to have a lower diversity.
The difference reached statistical significance for NFAT5 (p = 0.031), while differences for IFNAR2 and PRKCA were marginally non-significant (p = 0.077 for both).
We performed a Pearson correlation between the untransformed means of the two main behaviors of the 1 st factor, aggression and nest relocation, that confirmed to some extent the negative relationship (a marginally non-significant trend: Bartlett χ 2 statistic = 3.12, df = 1, P = 0.077).
Change in time spent in maintenance activity with age was marginally non-significant ( F 4,138 = 2.26, p = 0.077; figure 2d ) while time spent walking ( F 4,134.9 = 0.55, p = 0.70; figure 2e ) and number of wing extension bouts ( F 4,78.6 = 1.24, p = 0.30; see the electronic supplementary material, table S2) did not change with age.
The increase was especially pronounced at night, with a 4.5 fold increase (Table S1 ) although this interaction was marginally non-significant in the linear model (‘Day vs Night’ x ‘Before and After cyclone Yasi’: df = 1, 24, z = 1.765, p = 0.077).
14 Taylor and colleagues demonstrated that three HIIT sessions weekly over 12 months induced a twofold reduction in liver fat compared with MICT, 15 although this was marginally non-significant (p = 0.077), likely due to the smaller sample size of the subanalysis (n = 42) in the original larger trial (n = 93). 16 In addition, Sabag and colleagues reported that performing low-volume HIIT (one 4-min session) 3 days weekly improved liver fat in inactive adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. 17 Although the aforementioned studies showed that HIIT might be an effective approach for reducing liver fat, there have been few studies that have investigated the efficacy of low-frequency (e.g., once weekly) HIIT on liver fat reduction.
The number of all emerged adults and females was slightly higher on caterpillars fed on R+ plants than those fed on R-plants, but the differences were marginally non-significant (adults: χ 2 (1) = 3.13, P = 0.077; females: χ 2 (1) = 3.68, P = 0.055; Fig. 4 A).
When considering each population separately, we found a significant association with PM resistance in Obuasi ( P = 0.034, odds ratio [OR] = 1.76, 1.04 to 3.4) and marginally non-significant in Baguida ( P = 0.077).
The rate of early rebleeding (defined as rebleeding occurring within 30 days) was lower in the EBL-C group than in the EBL group, although this difference was only marginally non-significant (8.9% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.0776).
When comparing the SDAI remission rates in the Q4 group and the combined Q1–Q3 group, the SDAI remission rate for the Q4 group was lower than that for the Q1–Q3 combined group, although this difference was marginally non-significant (31.3% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.0776) (Supplementary Fig.
Planned paired t-tests indicated that only dual-task spatial memory accuracy set-size 8 had a significant improvement [ t (13) = −2.28, p = .04, d = -.90] while dual task set size 12 was marginally non-significant [ t (13) = −1.91, p = .078, d = .79] (see figure 9b ).
However, the only significant correlation between the night WVCs and LDP was found for December (r s = 0.313; p < 0.001; n = 155), with marginally non-significant correlations observed for September (r s = 0.144; p = 0.078; n = 150), October (r s = 0.149; p = 0.064; n = 155), and November (r s = 0.154; p = 0.061; n = 150).
Further, the relationship between BPSD and caregiving stress was not significant for those with low social support (B = −0.140, p = 0.286, 95% CI [−0.478, 0.166]), With moderate social support, the trend was positive and marginally non-significant (B = 0.164, p = 0.078, 95% CI [−0.020, 0.477]).
Another linear mixed model found that none of the predictor variables influenced TTE, although SVL had a marginally non-significant effect ( P = 0.078, Table 1 ).
In the middle catchment, spring displays a significant positive trend (tau: 0.459, p < 0.0001) with an increase in rainfall, whereas summer has a marginally non-significant negative trend (tau: -0.193, p = 0.078), and winter and autumn show no significant trends.
As shown in Table 2 , the increase in the severity of bodily pain across the three-time points was statistically significant among those with NGM and T2D (p <0.001), but marginally non-significant in the prediabetes group (p <0.078).
( t = − 4.17, p < 0.001) and was marginally non-significant for both L. plantarum ( t = − 1.85, p = 0.078) and B. cereus ( t = − 1.98, p = 0.061).
The D group showed a rising trend in hepatic TAC compared to healthy animals, albeit marginally non-significant ( p = 0.078).
Among the added predictors: The E score showed a positive but marginally non-significant association with R&D (β = 0.269; p = .078), suggesting a potential but inconclusive link.
Indeed, post hoc analysis revealed that the No Stress Run group had a greater ratio of HVA + DOPAC:DA than Stress Control group ( P = 0.0275), though marginally non-significant trends in the same direction were also observed for No Stress Control ( P = 0.0782) and Stress Run ( P = 0.0602) groups.