“marginally insignificant”

In addition, the main effect of the light regime on cercarial emergence was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.078; Table 1 ) as the species tended to have increased cercarial emergence during dark or night time (Fig. 1 ).

Disperse Puberty_2 samples at age 14 showed significantly more internalizing behavior at the same age without accounting for covariates (estimate = 0.4 and adjusted p = 0.02), while the difference became marginally insignificant after considering covariates (estimate = 0.3 and adjusted p = 0.079).

30 , 31 , 32 The histological assessment indicated moderate inhibition of inflammation in the lungs of CCL8-deficient mice that remained marginally insignificant (p = 0.0790) compared to the wt controls ( Figures 1 A and 1B).

Weight had a positive but marginally insignificant effect (estimate = 1.1116, p = 0.0798), and duration of treatment was not significantly associated (estimate = − 2.5928, p = 0.1190).

However, among females, this same ratio was marginally insignificant ( χ 2 = 2.98, df = 1, p = 0.08, Table 1 ).

On day 4, the difference was marginally insignificant for absolute tarsus length (F 2, 37 = 2.64, P = 0.08) and significant for relative tarsus length (F 2, 37 = 3.89, P = 0.03).

Whilst Farm 2 had lower average parity than Farms 1 and 3, this was marginally insignificant (Farm 1, system A = 3.12 ± SE 0.12; Farm 2, system B = 2.48 ± SE 0.21; Farm 3, system C = 2.96 ± SE 0.24 and system D 2.93 ± SE0.11, F 3,115 =2.31, P = 0.080, from LMM).

We assessed the heterogeneity among reported prevalence using the I 2 statistic, and it was marginally insignificant (I 2 = 36.7%, P = 0.08).

Although iNOS expression was marginally insignificant between Adv/GM-CSF treated and untreated tumors (p = 0.08).

Analysis of the Framingham study [ 39 ] data showed that the presence of microalbuminuria above the median, ≥ 3.9 μg/mg in men and ≥ 7.5 μg/mg in women, was associated with a threefold increased risk of CVD (adjusted HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.44, p < 0.001) and for a marginally insignificant increase in total mortality (adjusted HR 1.75, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.22, p = 0.08) compared to those with a lower-than-average UACR.

3G - bottom) found a marginally insignificant effect of Time surrounding the press (F 9,63 = 1.79, p = 0.08), a significant effect of Type of press (Initiating press v.

For observations, the second-order trend is positive for almost all trend lengths (with a small range of marginally insignificant trends with lengths between 74 and 78 years, all with 0.05 < p -value < 0.08), reflecting that ΔSST west-east is increasing at a growing rate (Fig. 4b, c ).

There was a marginally insignificant difference between the cold-treated samples from the egg stage (3.11±0.06; MWU, P = 0.08) and the corresponding room temperature control, which we attribute to the small sample size of cold-treated individuals from this developmental stage (N = 5).

All estimates of socioeconomic status were inversely and significantly correlated with ReVA, except objective material status, which had a marginally insignificant result (r = −0.05, p = 0.080 and r = −0.05, p = 0.077).

The timing of down‐migration was more variable for non‐natal than natal fish in six of the 8 years in which both strategies were present ( p < 0.01), and the mean date of down‐migration was more variable inter‐annually for non‐natal than natal fish, though this effect was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.08).

In the central 2 mm zone, the median epithelial thickness for healthy thick corneas was 52.49 μm (range, 50.36 to 54.22 μm), while for KC corneas it was 50.62 μm (range, 44.74 to 52.66 μm). Surprisingly, the difference between the two groups was marginally insignificant ( P = 0.08).

In addition, metabolic rate increased by 0.02 ± 0.01 mL O 2 h −1 with each additional limb that was missing, though this effect was marginally insignificant ( t = 1.76, p = 0.08) and decreased by 0.02 ± 0.01 mL O 2 h −1 with each additional missing limb that was regenerating, though this effect was again marginally insignificant ( t = −1.95, p = 0.053).

As for the three variables reflecting residents’ perceptions of the community environment, except for Factor 1 in Model 1, which was marginally insignificant ( p -value = 0.081), the other three variables consistently showed statistical significance across all models, with relatively small fluctuations in the range of their regression coefficients (see Table 5 ). 4.

The seston C:N and C:P ratios decreased significantly with water conductivity, and the bacterial C:P followed the same pattern, although with a marginally insignificant relationship ( P = 0.082) ( Figures 3A – C ).

Although this was confirmed by the univariable regression analysis (coefficient = −0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.31 to −0.05, P = 0.035), when adjusted for age and history of ophthalmic surgery, the results became marginally insignificant (coefficient = −0.59, 95% CI = −1.24 to 0.07, P = 0.082).

The time × extract interaction is marginally insignificant ( p = 0.083), while the triple dose × time × extract interaction is significant (F = 2.645, p = 0.007), indicating complexity in the combined response of the three factors.

Elongation, a measure of the arterial ability to stretch, also varied, with a lower elongation observed at 6 months (110.196%) than at 0 months (153.726%); however, this difference was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.085).

Significant improvements from baseline to all assessed time points were also observed for scores of every individual domain of PAC-SYM (all P ≤ 0.03; Figure 5 A) and PAC-QOL (all P ≤ 0.0001; Figure 5 B). In COMPOSE-4, subgroup analysis of subjects who had overall PAC-SYM scores ≥ 1 at baseline (naldemedine, n = 52; placebo, n = 57) showed greater, although marginally insignificant, improvements from baseline to day 15 in overall PAC-SYM scores with naldemedine versus placebo (–0.54 versus –0.35; P = 0.0857; supplementary Table S2 , available at Annals of Oncology online).

The goodness-of-fit test on all the characteristic species showed that in the mountains only the mycetophages were significantly unevenly distributed among the sampled heights (χ 2 = 16.294, p < 0.01), while the result for all characteristic species was marginally insignificant (χ 2 = 8.098, p = 0.086).

Top predator removal also resulted in a marginally insignificant decline in herbivore density ( p = .087) and a marginally insignificant increase in detritivore density ( p = .06), while no effect of removal was observed for the abundance of omnivore zooplankton (Table 2 ).