Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally insignificant”

512 sentences · 512 papers · 586 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally insignificantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The effect of Köppen-Geiger climate classification on SMR residuals for native species was marginally insignificant by ANOVA ( F 2,83 = 3.08, p = 0.051); however a priori contrasts, assuming an ordered increase of aridity between the Köppen-Geiger climate classifications, identified a significant effect of increasing aridity on SMR residuals ( F 1,84 = 6.22, p = 0.015).
marginally insignificantp=0.0511.0× alphagold
The results of the present study confirmed that the addition of fentanyl to low-dose bupivacaine increased the success rate (stone-free rate) of TUL as complete stone-free status was achieved in 100% of the patients in group B, which was marginally insignificant (p=0.051).
marginally insignificantp = .0521.0× alphagold
Fox activity patterns were not significantly different at the significance threshold; however, they were only marginally insignificant (Watson–Wheeler test; W 2 = 5.90, p = .052, Figure 4 ). 4 DISCUSSION This study investigated how habitat and human activity influenced the spatiotemporal activities of urban badgers and urban foxes.
marginally insignificantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Unlike orangutans, humans also fixated emotional faces more often and longer compared to neutral faces, with some of these findings being only marginally insignificant (rate: anger vs. neutral χ 2 = 3.73, df = 1, p = 0.053; happy vs. neutral χ 2 = 7.15, df = 1, p = 0.007; duration: anger vs. neutral χ 2 = 3.60, df = 1, p = 0.058; happy vs. neutral χ 2 = 3.36, df = 1, p = 0.067) (see Tables S3 and S4 ).
marginally insignificantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
With regard to depression, there was a marginally insignificant effect for type of control group ( Q (1) = 3.74, p = 0.053), whereas no significant effect was observed for intervention duration ( Q (1) = 0.03, p = 0.87), training frequency ( Q (1) = 2.8, p = 0.09), session length ( Q (1) = 0.7, p = 0.4), and study quality ( Q (1) = 0.44, p = 0.51).
marginally insignificantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
After adjusted for age, sex, education level and APOE ɛ4 in multivariate linear regression models, PSMD ( β = −0.28, P = 0.015), CMB numbers ( β = −0.07, P < 0.001) and WMHV ( β = −0.03, P = 0.003) remained negatively correlated with the MMSE score, while CSVD burden exhibited a marginally insignificant correlation with the MMSE score ( β = −0.20, P = 0.053).