Barely Significant
← all phrases

“likely to be significant”

1,825 sentences · 1,825 papers · 19,184 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.054

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

These effects are likely to be significant in cervical carcinogenesis, where there is competitive selection of cells with elevated expression of virus oncoproteins. pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppress
Furthermore, genetic heterogeneity is less of a concern in Taiwan than in the United States [ 31 ], and as a result, potential bias due to population stratification is less likely to be significant in our study, and the probability that the functional variants targeted by the same SNPs of individual FA genes are different in cases and controls due to differences in the genetic background of the two groups is small.
The prevalence of DM was reported to be 4.6% and 9.75% in two different studies conducted in Yemen.[ 9 10 ] Risk factors such as obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and hyperlipidemia exist in the Yemeni population.[ 9 ] Thus the burden of DM is likely to be significant and with improved socioeconomic conditions, especially in urban areas of Yemen, it is likely to further rise.[ 11 ] With improved health services, mortality due to renal and cardiac complications of DM will reduce and patients with DM would live longer.[ 12 ] DR that is associated with the duration of DM is therefore likely to increase.[ 13 ] Hence an organized approach to address DR within ‘VISION 2020’ initiative is now recommended.[ 14 ] For proper planning of a public health program, evidence-based information is crucial.
This mechanism is likely to be significant for some genes, but it is difficult to make clear statements regarding the number of genes that might be regulated in this way. 2) If chromatin accessibility is still considered an important indicator of damage responsiveness, please explain why the 5% of genes overlapping with gene expression data are not followed up as a set of interesting genes, and also why they do not follow up with the 28 potential DRMS enhancers defined by chromatin accessibility criteria?