Barely Significant
← all phrases

“just failed to reach significance”

280 sentences · 280 papers · 325 search hits before verification

In the literature

The slope of the trendline for temporal discrimination for distal CA1 is the steepest and the only one different from 0, indicating the highest correlation of Arc activity with temporal discrimination in this area (of note, D2 time by region by proximodistal interaction effect is not significant because b time just failed to reach significance for distal CA3).
But, again independently of our lack of surprise, we would find the null result much more informative if we had neuronavigated the TMS coil to individual hotspots as compared to placing the TMS coil over the EEG 10-20 P4 location (sophisticated localization procedure), or if the reduction in magic appreciation was zero as compared to a reduction in magic appreciation that was in the right direction but just failed to reach significance (effect size evaluation).
31 Overall, although progression to macroalbuminuria just failed to reach significance in EXSCEL, less participants with baseline normoalbuminuria treated with exenatide progressed to develop albuminuria versus placebo treatment during the first 6 months of the trial (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.03), but this was mainly accounted for by less transition to microalbuminuria. 29 In the ELIXA
Whereas younger participants showed superior WMC for the Strategy group (which just failed to reach significance with a two-tailed test), for older participants WMC was significantly greater for the Puzzle group compared to both the No Games group and the Strategy group ( Table 4 ; Fig. 3 b).
Although the difference in perceived hand hardness between the MHI and the controls just failed to reach significance, it is important to note that hardness rating significantly increased after the stimulation in the MHI, but not in the controls.
The Marble-Hand Illusion.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3951417
Proliferative responses to HIG were significantly greater than those of healthy controls in the first- degree relatives (p <0.01) but just failed to reach significance in recent-onset IDD subjects; responses to HBG in first-degree relatives and recent-onset IDD subjects were both significantly greater than in healthy controls (p <0.003 andp <0.05, respec- tively).
The interaction between ISI and time (F 5,120 = 2.24; η p 2 = 0.09; p = 0.054) just failed to reach significance, but indicates a strong trend for facilitatory changes in the PMd-M1 interaction late in the preparation period to be more pronounced for the LIHI mechanism (40 ms ISI) compared to those (minimal) changes observed for SIHI (8 ms ISI) ( figure 5 ).