Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp ≤ 10 –400.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The SEA output includes an output ranking the proposed target/query interaction by probability (significant, p ≤ 10 –15 ; highly significant, p ≤ 10 –40 ) and by similarity score to an annotated compound/drug (Tanimoto coefficient, max Tc ≥ 0.40, max Tc 1.0 = exact match). 14 The SEA output ( Fig. 5 ) for our hit compounds was potentially informative in identifying additional potential targets for our most potent hit, niclosamide (KCNMA1 and TMPRSS4), as well as GSK-650394 (CAMKK2, AXL, RIPK1).
highly significantP = 1.7 × 10 −400.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The PSs for TG (30 SNPs), LDL-C (28 SNPs), and HDL-C (60 SNPs) explained a relatively small, but highly significant, proportion of the variance (5.6 % [F = 157, P = 1.7 × 10 −40 ], 3.1 % [F = 99, P = 6.2 × 10 −27 ] and 5.1 % [F = 164, P = 1.1 × 10 −36 ]; Additional file 6 ) and were not associated with confounders (Additional file 7 ) with the exception of the HDL-C PS, which was associated with confounder neutrophil counts ( P value = 1.8 × 10 −2 ).
highly significantp = 2.99e-400.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When we compared the expression of all genes located within regions with significantly altered compartment scores, we observed a highly significant trend towards an increase in expression of genes with an increased compartment score and vice versa (Fig. 7a , top right; p = 2.99e-40).
highly significantp = 8 × 10 −400.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference in fit of the 13 models was highly significant ( p = 8 × 10 −40 , ANOVA), but there was no significant difference in the fits of the five top models, all of which incorporated a perseverative learning mechanism: Perseveration/Reward-learning model (PR model, ref. 36 ); differential forgetting Q -learning 33 ; ideal observer with perseveration (see Methods); ideal-observer Bayesian filters with perseveration for either a generic probabilistic reversal-learning task (see Methods), or a generic drifting reward probability task 37 .
highly significantp = 2.87 × 10 −390.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of mean firing rates of responsive single neurons for the best location of each neuron in each training phase, after subtracting baseline activity, revealed a highly significant difference between stages (Fig. 3b ; 1-way ANOVA test, F 3,531 = 72.4, p = 2.87 × 10 −39 for the cue period, F 3,531 = 21.93, p = 2.12 × 10 −13 for the first delay period).