“highly significant”

No significant differences were found for Chao richness means between non-pregnant (585 ± 340) and pregnant ewes (509 ± 154), but variance differences were highly significant (F = 4.87; p = 0.0006).

In Model 3 PCT + sCD14, a score of 2 is highly significant (p = 0.0006) and with increased odds (11.67 (2.82–57.08)) in the diagnosis of sepsis compared to a score of 1.

The 24‐month LS meta‐analysis with five paired comparisons in 885 adolescents showed a highly significant weighted mean BMD difference of −0.02 (95% CI: −0.03 to −0.01) g/cm 2 in CHC‐exposed adolescents ( P = 0.0006).

We showed a highly significant downregulation of nrf2 ( p = 0.0006, Figure 1A ) and nrf2 -induced genes mRNA levels in patients’ skin fibroblasts, HO-1 ( p = 0.001, Figure 1B ), GCL ( p < 0.0001, Figure 1C ), and TRX ( p < 0.0001, Figure 1D ) compared to healthy individuals.

The interaction effect between variety, drying temperature and chemical pretreatment on the TPC content in oven‐dried samples was found to be highly significant ( p = .0006; F = 3.40; df = 12).

Statistical analysis of α-synuclein immunofluorescence in the striatum revealed a highly significant main effect of group (F (2,24) = 10.17, p = 0.0006), whereas neither sex (F (1,24) = 0.621, p = 0.438) nor the group × sex interaction (F (2,24) = 0.094, p = 0.911) showed significant effects.

Combining these data with our previously published data revealed a highly significant association with MUTYH ( P =0.0006).

During this period, we noted a highly significant decrease in the AAT risk in 2013 [ P = 0.0006, Table 1 ].

Pre-pronation values of the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio were significantly different between groups (group S vs D: 150 ± 56 vs 115 ± 46; p = 0.006), but only pre-pronation FiO 2 remained highly significant at multivariate analysis (0.67 ± 0.16 vs 0.82 ± 0.18; univariate p = 0.0006, multivariate p = 0.001, OR 6.11).

Ordinary one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was performed to compare the amount of mGluR‐LTD in the four different conditions (control; roscovitine; LP‐211; LP‐211 + roscovitine, Figure 1c ), confirming a highly significant difference (*** p = 0.0006).

The between-group comparison confirmed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0006).

This correlated with a highly significant difference in the frequency of antithrombotic drug usage in the older patients ( p = 0.0006).

This effect is statistically highly significant (γ = 95%, p = 0.0006).

A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences between groups (controls, mHE, HE, see Table 1 ) for the CFF [χ 2 (2) = 14.83, p = 0.0006].

The difference of resistance against starvation-induced cell death was highly significant with pIGFBP7 transfected Jurkat cells showing 85 % more proliferation measured by WST-1 signal on day four compared to the pCntrl cells ( P -value = 0.0006; Fig. 2b ).

We also observe that diazepam brought about a highly significant ( F (5.31) = 30.67, P < 0.0006) decrease in the number of entries in closed arms and an increase in the open arms ( Figure 1 ). 3.2.2.

Highly significant improvements were found for the main spinal parameters from T0 to T1: TK reduced from 54.22± 13.58 to 44.48± 12.80 (p= 0.0006), LL from 57.43± 11.16 to 51.13± 10.28 (p= 0.0077) and SSA from 132.87± 9.80 to 127.09± 9.24 (p= 0.0036); no significant differences were found for the other parameters.

The between-group comparison confirmed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0006), suggesting a notable effect of CKDB-322 on leptin regulation.

Our study was not designed to detect the correlation between HPDT and areas of secondary hyperalgesia; however, we find a highly significant result (P = 0.0006).

A t-test comparing RISKDIFF high revealed a highly significant difference between the two genotypes (5.0±1.3% for L/L versus −5.0±2.2% for S/L; t = 7.69, df = 5, p = 0.0006; Figure 3B ).

Furthermore, there was a highly significant increase in normalised Time to Peak (TTP) BH 2 for PSY compared to those of both MD ( p = 0.0006) and MC ( p = 0.029), whereas MD and MC were not significantly different ( p = 0.75) ( Fig. 5B ).

This rate difference was both congruent with the difference in ML estimates of ω [ 2 ] and highly significant ( P = 0.0006 by Student's unpaired t -test).

A contingency χ 2 -test revealed highly significant ( p = 0.0006) statistical comparison of the exclusive variants in the patient population to those in the control group.

Further, Vo et al found a highly significant correlation (p=0.0006) between reduced ATM mRNA abundance, as measured by real-time RT–PCR, and aberrant methylation of the ATM gene promoter.

FHO/RP ratio did not present significant differences in yellow-green light conditions in between groups comparison, whereas in infrared light condition the comparison between groups showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.0006) with a larger ratio in Control Group (1.055) compared to TMD Group (0.967) ( Table 2 ).