Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From trial 7 onwards, however, both single elements were discriminated from their compound, which was highly significant at the last acquisition trial (trial 10: Chi 2 -test; p < 0.0003; after Bonferroni correction), resulting in a stable and significant discrimination after 1 h consolidation time (MEM: Chi 2 -test; p < 0.0003; after Bonferroni correction). 3.4 Response latency decreased during multimodal learning Si
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Among these, four genes showed high statistical significance ( G2E3, p = 0.0031, FC = 1.9; ZNF695 , p = 0.0096, FC = 2.0; CEP41 , p = 0.0023, FC = 2.2; RGPD1 , p = 0.0031, FC = 2.9), whereas the remaining six genes were highly significant ( NOL4, p = 0.0003, FC = 3.1; SOX6, p = 0.0003, FC = 3.2; GOLGA6C, p = 0.0002, FC = 5.9; PCDHA9, p = 0.0001, FC = 11; GOLGA6B , p = 0.0009, FC = 4.1; LMLN , p < 0.0001, FC = 3.4).
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spearman correlation between mean NanoLuc activity and mean mCherry iMFI across all conditions was strong and highly significant (ρ = 0.867, p = 0.0003, n = 12), supporting the general applicability of our terminator characterization framework (see Fig. 5 B). 4 Discussion This study demonstrates that heterologous 3′ terminators are functional in A . oryzae .
highly significantp-value = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite the fact that few within experiment comparisons resulted in significant effects of p CO 2 , patterns in carbon removal and bacterioplankton growth dynamics were consistent across all experiments and locations, and are highly significant: cell-specific TOC removal ( Fig 4 ) and bacterioplankton carbon demand ( Fig 5 ) were consistently enhanced at elevated p CO 2 (p-value = 0.0003, Fisher’s sign test; p-value < 0.0001, t-test, respectively), while bacterioplankton growth efficiency ( Fig 6 ) was significantly reduced at elevated p CO 2 (p-value = 0.0003, Fisher’s sign test).
highly significantP = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ANOVA revealed a significant difference across groups ( P = 0.011), confirming that at least one intervention was more effective than the others Kruskal–Wallis, which is more robust to nonnormality and skewness in data, also indicated highly significant differences ( P = 0.0003).