“highly significant”

Using post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test when Group I (Zirconomer) and Group II (Hi-Dense) were compared, there were statistically highly significant differences found ( P = 0.000).

The ANOVA results indicate that the regression model is highly significant (value of p = 0.000), with an F -value of 990.024.

Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and Severity Scores of Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis ( Table 3 ) According to the Fontaine score, there was a highly significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels in patients with a IIB score compared to those with an IIA score (p=0.000).

Effects of genotype and severance on plant performance in the first phase Severance had highly significant negative effects on all components of mass and on ramet number of the apical portion ( Figures 1A–F ; Table 1A : F = 19.03 – 35.04; P = 0.000 – 0.000).

There was a highly significant relationship between pleural fluid, TTF-1, and lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.000).

The WHODHAS scores are highly significant across all dimensions ( p = 0.000).

Results: The result of this study shows that there was highly significant improvement in six-minute walk distance pre and post intervention in chemotherapy (33.75+21.55, p=0.000), radiation therapy (39.69+25.46, p=0.000) and chemoradiotherapy (32.06+16.49, p=0.000) within the group.

The association between the histopathological report and RIPASA score was found to be statistically highly significant (p=0.000).

Association of socioeconomic factors with the risk of the GC incidence The output of the model, presented in Table 7 and 8 , shows this model was highly significant (F-Statistic: 82.32235; P =0.0000).

intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).

Furthermore, the regression model suggested that altitude alone does not significantly affect transect richness (T = −1.19, p = 0.2431), contrasting with the highly significant effect of Asteraceae richness (T = 5.36, p = 0.0000).

The difference is statistically highly significant ( t = 5.93, p < 0.000) and with respect to effect size almost large (d = 0.70).

When it came to opinions regarding dental college as a source of information about child abuse, there was a highly significant difference between second-year students (six; 14.0%) and fifth-year students (thirty-one; 96.9%) with a ( p -value = 0.000), but no statistical significance between males (twenty; 52.6%) and females (seventeen; 45.9%) ( p -value = 0.563).

Because the investigated variables were not normally distributed (all p -values were highly significant using the Shapiro–Wilk test: study duration ( p < 0.000), study phases ( p < 0.000)), we employed correlation analysis according to Spearman.

The indirect effect via this mechanism equals 0.011 and is highly significant ( p < 0.000).

On the other hand, the isolated effects of the product factor were highly significant, with p = 0.0000 for g s , p = 0.0009 for C i , and p = 0.0031 for E .

For the branch models (Table 2 ), the H 1 hypothesis (H 0 as null) was found to be highly significant (H 0 –H 1 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .000), while the H 2 model (H 0 as null) was not supported (H 0 –H 2 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .142).

The results revealed a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000) with χ 2 (1, N = 453) = 90.644.

Additionally, stoma color and stoma edema were highly significant factors, with ORs ranging from 0.001 to 0.085 (95%CI: 0.010, P = 0.000) and 0.206 to 0.594 (95%CI: 0.350, P = 0.000), respectively.

Comparative analysis with existing CGM methods reveals that our paper’s KNN model exhibits lower RMSE and MARD at 0.11 and 8.96%, respectively, and the fNIRS data were highly significant positive correlation with actual blood glucose levels ( r = 0.995, p < 0.000).

Two-way ANOVA revealed that doses, time, and dose and time interaction were highly significant ( p = 0.000) ( Table 4 ).

The correlation between the two SIPRe samples (junior and expert therapists) was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.936; p<000).

The experimental group demonstrated a significant decrease in the mean score for the five times sit-to-stand test from 17.78 s (±2.54) at T1 to 13.85 s (±2.74) at T2, with a t-value of 10.213 and a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.000 **).

Assessment of publication bias The Cochran’s Q statistic was highly significant (Q = 1.8 × 10 6 , P = 0.000), indicating substantial heterogeneity among the studies.

Reproduction and population growth parameters The effect of temperature was highly significant for the different reproductive parameters including gross ( F = 11.41; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 14.405; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fecundity rates, gross ( F = 15.82; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 17.51; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fertility rates, mean eggs per day ( F = 10.66; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and mean fertile eggs per day ( F = 13.15; df = 4; P value = 0.00) ( Table 1 ).