“highly significant”

The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated a highly significant difference in SUV mean across age groups in males (H = 25.46, p < 0.0001), with a trend in females (H = 8.52, p = 0.074).

Statistical analysis demonstrated highly significant differences between treatment intervals for all bacterial species (p < 0.0001).

Analysis of variance showed highly significant variation due to year-by-genotype interaction effects ( p < 0.0001) in both HRP and CGP ( Table 2 ).

By 72 hours, a highly significant (p < 0.0001) significant reduction in p-AKT/AKT levels was noted across all treatment groups.

The main effect of “correctness” factor controlling for age and sex was highly significant as for TPT, F (1,51) = 23.78; p < 0.0001, as for AED, F (1,51) = 15.65; p < 0.0001.

ANOVA showed that both season (i.e., autumn and spring) and population had a highly significant effect on mass-specific energy content of lipid and glycogen stores ( P << 0.0001; Table S2 ).

Results were highly significant in all quintiles (p<0·0001 in all cases).

Lead treatment had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.0001) in chlorophyll a, with lower concentrations observed at higher lead doses.

To understand the kinetics of apoptosis, we performed a time course experiment that revealed a highly significant decrease in live cells after 3.5 h of stimulation with B1 that extended to 4.5 h ( P < 0.0001, Figure S5A in Supplementary Material); of note, there was a significant difference in viability, compared to IgG-treated cells, at the 30-min time point ( P = 0.043), but this was no longer evident at 1.5 and 2.5 h post mAb treatment.

Conversely, as found for bottlenose dolphins ( Williams et al., 2017b ), there were highly significant relationships between V̇ O 2 ss (J kg −1 min −1 ) and f S (strokes min −1 ) ( n =30 swims, d.f.=1, 28, F =25.53, P <0.0001, AICc=304.28, BIC=308.29; Fig. 4A ) for beluga whales, where: (1) and between V̇ O 2 ss (J kg −1 min −1 ) and swim speed ( U swim , m s −1 ) ( n= 30 swims, d.f.=1, 28, F =54.93, P <0.0001, AICc=288.48, BIC=291.76; Fig. 4B ), where: (2) even within the relatively narrow range of exercise efforts representing the preferred performance levels of the individual whales.

( 5 ) Highly significant correlations were found between RT-PCR results and antigen levels (Pearson r = −0.61; p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1 B ).

These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

RESULTS: Diabetic patients showed highly significant decrease in the level of visfatin compared to the control group (P = 0.0001).

A 2 × 2 contingency analysis comparing the groups was highly significant (Chi-square = 25.75, df = 1, p < .0001, Phi = .30).

ANOVA analysis in T-47D cells though showed significant but only MBD1 & MBD2 genes have highly significant P <0.0001 change in protein expression concerning resveratrol.

The difference in SHM in the long prime (week 29) versus 10 week prime was highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by Mann–Whitney, Fig. 4b ; P < 0.0009, Fig. 4c ), and the difference in median mutations between weeks 10 and 29 was as great as that between weeks 4 and 10, indicative of robust GC functionality continuing through to at least week 29 (Fig. 4a–c ).

Though lyso-Gb1 values at enrollment were widely distributed, they displayed a moderate and statistically highly significant correlation with disease severity measured by the GD-DS3 scoring system in all GD patients (r = 0.602, p < 0.0001).

The differences between control and TIUKO CF rats was highly significant (p < 0.0001) Discussion The development of the TIUKO procedure permits the examination of mid-gestation developmentally required genes in the absence of both early lethality and compensatory mechanisms that ameliorate the final disease phenotype.

This difference in sperm count in both groups was highly significant (t = 11.15; P < 0.0001; df = 9) [ Table 1 , Figure 1 ].

It was statistically highly significant with a P value of < 0.0001.

The cranial base length showed a weak negative correlation with AHI ( ρ = −0.25; p < 0.05) but showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the mandibular length ( ρ = 0.70; p < 0.0001).

The regression model was highly significant with an F-value of 308.39 (p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant (p > 0.05), indicating that the model adequately described the experimental data.

We observed moderate but highly significant agreement between positivity by SBP1 and REX1 (agreement = 75.4%, kappa = 0.33; P < 0.0001) and PHISTb and REX1 (agreement = 86.4%, kappa = 0.15; P < 0.001) and lower agreement between SBP1 and PHISTb (agreement = 71.1%, kappa = 0.12; P < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

A highly significant difference between the two groups was seen ( Q = 17.70, p < 0.0001).

Highly significant values ( p < 0.0001) are shown in red.