“highly significant”

The observed differences in survival were highly significant both for OS and PFS (Log-rank test; P <0.0001 each).

The regression models were highly significant ( df: 9; F-value: 80.78; p < 0.0001 for TPP and df: 9F-value: 266.05; p < 0.0001 for TAC) and linear ( df: 3; F-value: 5.68; p < 0.02 for TPP and df: 3; F-value: 6.55; p < 0.02 for TAC), quadratic ( df: 3; F-value: 229.76; p < 0.0001 for TPP and df: 3; F-value: 750.99; p < 0.0001 for TAC) and interaction ( df: 3; F-value: 6.91; p < 0.01 for TPP and df: 3; F-value: 40.62; p < 0.0001 for TAC) parameters were significant for the two responses.

The stage factor remained highly significant in all cases [F(2,54) = 70.63; p < 0.0001], reflecting the expected general progression of seizures.

This analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between HLA-presentation and the abundance of the source proteins ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ).

The correlation coefficient ( r 2) values range from 0.70 to 0.95 (0.70 [for professors], 0.89 [for assistant professors], and 0.95 [for associate professors]); F values are highly significant ( P < .0001) for all faculty subgroups.

A highly significant association was observed for rs1248923790 ( p < 0.0001, χ2 = 26.39). the TT genotype was significantly more common in disease cases (201) compared to controls (136), with an increased risk of disease (OR = 2.106, RR = 1.446, 95% CI: 1.249–1.679).

Thus, by restricting the evolution of AAA diameters to 60-months follow-up, the reduction in diameter remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but the aneurysm sac regression tended to be larger in non-diabetic subjects than in diabetic patients ( Table 2 ).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

A Hotelling’s T 2 test confirmed that this difference was highly significant ( T 2 = 685.25, P < 0.0001).

Results it was observed that, in the osteoarthritic hips, hip neck fracture and aseptic necrosis, the degree of agreement was highly significant (p < 0.0001), in the measurements of anteversion and inclination angles, among the three assessments, from intra as well as inter-observers.

Survival benefit and safety profile Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a highly significant intergroup difference (log-rank test, P < 0.0001).

subjects who ate no seafood, these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with Hg levels that were higher 3–7-fold in maternal hair, 7–8-fold in maternal blood, 4–6-fold in the placenta, and >10-fold in cord blood.

This ~10-fold reduction in mean numbers of foci with respect to the WT is highly significant (unpaired t-test; p < 0.0001) and confirms the SPO11-dependence of the great majority of the observed pachytene EdU foci.

and C.H.] and a high Spearman correlation coefficient ( = 0.82) and a highly significant (p<0.0001) correlation between measurements was observed.

Through statistical analysis using Student’s t-test, we observed highly significant differences in anti-Xa assay results between bleeding and non-bleeding groups ( p < 0.0001) at both peak and trough times.

The decline in mortality was much steeper in the younger age group, and the interaction between age group and calendar year was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table S21 ).

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

The correlation between food items/categories and ITMI was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.0001, except for dairy p < 0.01) for pasta, vegetables, fruit, legumes, fish, EVOO, and dairy products; while it was negative and significant for potato, butter, soft drinks, red/cured meat, and sweets with Pearson’s coefficients ranging from 0.10 (dairy) to 0.49 (vegetables) and from −0.20 (potato) to −0.41 (soft drinks) for positive and negative correlations, respectively.

There was a significant difference between farm and slaughterhouse samples, with farm samples showing higher IgG levels ( p = 0.0074) in pigs with a pleurisy score of 1, and the differences were highly significant, with p -values < 0.0001, indicating much higher IgG levels in farm samples compared to slaughterhouse samples in pigs classified with the most severe pleurisy scores of 3 and 4 ( Figure 2 ). 3.7.

Keywords Femoroacetabular impingement hip hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation Particularly, the slopes with respect to time for the variables VAS, HHS, Lequesne ( Figure 4 ) and NSAIDs monthly intake ( Figure 5 ) were highly significant ( p < .0001; p < .0001; p < .0001; p = .0003).

When scores were evaluated, non-parametric ANOVA yielded a highly significant difference among groups (P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test) ( Fig. 1C ).

Using the same statistical procedure described for Figure 2 , this overlap between the experimental data and the theoretical prediction is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Figure 5 a shows the correlation between the CMB count in the whole brain detected by experts and the SHIVA-CMB in the 1992 T2*GRE scans of the MEMENTO participants, demonstrating the highly significant correlation ( Pearson’s R = 0.89, p < 0.0001) and a regression slope close to 1.

In the ‘immediately after surgery’ subgroup, the SMD with a 95% CI is −0.76 [−1.10, −0.42], with a highly significant p -value < 0.0001, I 2 = 9%.

One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis demonstrated that substrates had a highly significant effect on regimens 1, 2, 3, and 4 ( p = .0001).