24.46%, p < 0.0001), and there was a highly significant reduction in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group in the number who received a post-procedure prophylaxis (16.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
These results indicate that the antibacterial effectiveness of SH and BF is preserved throughout the extraction process and their transformation into nanoparticles, with statistical analysis confirming highly significant differences in antimicrobial activity between sample types for both ( F (5,12) = 252.15, p < 0.0001) and ( F (5,12) = 108.81, p < 0.0001).
A statistically highly significant interaction of beverage type × storage time was also demonstrated ( p < 0.0001).
It was 0.991 (187.545, p < 0.0001) for a* , with a highly significant effect of broccoli (246.62, p < 0.0001), IF (134.344, p < 0.0001) and BSG*IF (25.77, p = 0.004).
However, as expected, CST was a highly significant predictor of community composition (R 2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001).
In contrast, the random effect of sample was highly significant (from bootstrapping approach, p < 0.0001) indicating the marked biological variability between Linum stems.
Results: Data analysis shows that sleep quality (t = 33.35) ( P = 0.0000) and mental ability (t = 35.33) ( P = 0.0001) are both highly significant at P =0.0001.
This difference was highly significant ( P < .0001).
The model F-value of 178.56 indicated that the model was highly significant at p < 0.0001.
ANOVA supported the quadratic RSM model for TAC (Table 3 ) with a highly significant model ( F = 27.21, p < 0.0001; R 2 ~ 0.96).
Given the highly significant differences observed in our primary outcomes (often p < 0.0001), the results were considered robust against Type I error inflation, and thus post-hoc corrections were deemed unnecessary for the main exploratory analysis.
The median serum sCD163 in SLE patients was 12.3 ng/mL (IQR: 7.5–20.0), compared with 3.2 ng/mL (IQR: 3.0–3.8) in Non-SLE CKD patients, a difference that was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for all groups were compared using a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test, which revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 = 73.94, df = 7, p < 0.0001).
The negative association between the minimal doubling time and the average number of prophages per host genome was highly significant in this much larger data set (Spearman's ρ =−0.36, P <10 −4 ), independently of host genome size ( Supplementary Figure S7 and Supplementary Table S2 ).
When WT ovules were used, 59% of the assays showed pollen tubes growing toward WT ovules ( n =80), while only 10% of the pollen tubes grew toward the Scfrk1 -S1 ovules ( n =60), giving a highly significant P <0.0001 value in a two-sample binomial test.
Pairwise correlations (Table 5 ) were highly significant ( P <0.0001).
Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the dsRNA construct also had a highly significant impact (p < 0.0001, Figure 3C ).
Nonetheless, the effect of rearing condition on FF after taking z-score differences into account remained highly significant ( Con : F(1,285) = 31.39, p<0.0001; Pips : F(1,280) = 34.18, p<0.0001).
Again using FP C max as an example metric, the estimated between‐batch variance (0.0598) was 1.7‐fold larger than the estimated residual variance (0.0353) and was a highly significant contributor to total variability ( P < 0.0001).
The model was found to be highly significant, with an F -value of 118.2 ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was nonsignificant ( p = 0.9015), confirming the adequacy and robustness of the model.
Highly significant association was found between naive CD4 T cells and CD4+ RTE (all p-values <0.0001).
The analysis revealed a highly significant influence of pH on Cr( vi ) photoreduction efficiency ( F = 762.06, p < 0.0001), with an R 2 = 0.9965, confirming that pH accounted for over 99% of the total variation in removal performance.
The difference in spatial selectivity between the two brain areas was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
A highly significant elevation of IL-1α, IL1ß, TNF-α in patients of group C ( p = 0.0001) and a significant elevation of CD4+ cells in patients of group B ( p = 0.005) was shown.
As well as statistical analysis showing that highly significant differences at p<0.0001 as shown in Figure 2 .