“highly significant”

Correlations were also highly significant (p=0.0001) for NFF among different trails, with the coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.46.

Here, the baseline model demonstrated the expected strong association between internal data redundancy and model performance, with a substantial and highly significant ( p < 0.0001, bootstrap test with 10,000 replications) drop in performance as the partitioning threshold is decreased (from an AUC value of 0.67 at 99% to 0.63 at 90%)—resulting in a lower similarity between the training and test data sets.

The correlation coefficient of MRD between qPCR and ddPCR was 0.95 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ).

The pair group comparisons of day 7 v/s day 15, day 45, and 6 months showed a highly significant difference of 0.64, 1.48, and 1.80, respectively, and P value = 0.0001.

However, meals were significantly smaller and shorter in NG Y2R KD compared with controls ( Figure 2 , Figure 3 ); probability density functions for meal patterning readouts further illustrate highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) in average meal size and duration ( Suppl Figs. 3f and 3g ), with a trend to shorter intermeal durations, particularly in the dark phase ( Figure 3 ).

(2024) ( Paz-Ares et al., 2024 ), the OR increased to 2.67, a change that was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

This was a highly significant difference (Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.0001).

A highly significant increase in mean stiffness ( p < 0.0001) was observed in postoperative pancreatic samples exhibiting signs of parenchymal fibrosis or PDAC invasion compared to unaffected, intact pancreatic parenchyma.

Fer-1 demonstrated a marked restoration of cell viability with a highly significant statistical difference (F(3,8) = 59.18, p < 0.0001; Figure 2 D).

All potential covariates were non-significant and the final model contained only the highly significant effect of experiment type (F 6,113.1 = 11.46, P < 0.0001; Figure 1 ).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance testing ( Table S6 ) indicate both regression models are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit.

There was also highly significant positive correlation between serum IMA and MDA ( r = 0.843,P < 0.0001), whereas there were significant negative correlations between serum IMA and uric acid ( r = −0.237,P < 0.05), and albumin ( r = −0.326,P < 0.05).

The difference between the two PD severity cohorts was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that APS is a more sensitive method than RRS or BWS ( p = 0.1896 and 0.0020, respectively; Fig. 1l ).

In V1, the effect of eccentricity on BOLD response was highly significant ( F (1,23898) = 37.8; p < 0.0001; Cohen's f 2 = 0.319), indicating a strong relationship.

Overall, differences in species richness between elevational zones <2000 m were highly significant (ANOVA, F = 244.04, P <0.0001).

As shown in the table, the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and well fitted ( p -value of the misfit error term was 0.0823 > 0.05).

Supplementary data bmjopen-2023-077508supp001.pdf Regression model The logistic regression model was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001).

Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one‐way ANOVA, with highly significant differences (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01) for comparisons between consecutive groups, while “NS” indicates nonsignificant statistical difference between the data groups.

fMRI behavioral performances As expected, there was an highly significant main effect of working-memory load for both RT and accuracy (RT: F df(10) = 45.97, P < 0.0001; accuracy: F df(10) = 28.4, P < 0.0001) that depended on lengthened RT and reduced accuracy for progressively higher working-memory loads.

S1 , Supplementary Material online), differences with PALO being highly significant for Mammalia, Vertebrata, and paralogs (Mann–Whitney test P < 10 −4 ).

A strong positive correlation was observed among differential immune cells, with CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells showing a highly significant positive correlation (cor = 0.92, p < 0.0001), indicating a prominent co-expression pattern between these lymphocyte populations ( Figure 6 d).

Interestingly, we also observed strong positive correlations of serum SFRP5 with circulating concentrations of adiponectin ( r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and this association remained highly significant in multiple regression analysis ( β = 0.50, p < 0.0001), whereas association between SFRP5 and insulin sensitivity was no longer significant after adjusting for serum adiponectin.

There was a highly significant difference when comparing the animals with light and dark coats in activity “in the shade” and “in the sun” ( p < 0.0001).

This is a highly significant difference, as compared to the 49% de novo CNVs in vivo (p < 0.0001, binomial test).

Percent total protein decreased in maize seed endosperms transformed with the soybean ferritin transgene The mean percentage total protein differences between PCR positive and negative maize seed endosperm samples were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Table 4 ).