The high-risk group had a highly significant decreased OS compared with the low-risk group (p < 0.0001, hazard ratio [HR] = 8.98, 95% CI: 5.06–15.94; Figure 4 C).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Sex showed a highly significant association (χ2 = 524.02, p < 0.0001).
The first component explained the largest portion of the variance, accounting for 41.144% with an eigenvalue of 9.463224, and was highly significant (chi-square = 30699.3, p < 0.0001).
sclerotiorum populations from the four different countries with the R ST fixation index statistic highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for pairwise combinations of England/Norway ( R ST = 0.094), England/Australia ( R ST = 0.186), Scotland/Norway ( R ST = 0.068), Scotland/Australia ( R ST = 0.152), and Norway/Australia ( R ST = 0.198).
There was a highly significant relationship between the level of pCVI988 measured by the two q-PCR systems (p < 0.0001, Fig. 5 a), and between the level of RB-1B measured by the two q-PCR systems (p < 0.0001, Fig. 5 b).
The analysis also quantified the influence of parameters on TPPs yield through standardized coefficients: liquid-to-solid ratio (X 3 ) and ultrasonic temperature (X 4 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), followed by ultrasonic time (X 1 ) ( p = 0.005) and ultrasonic power (X 2 ) ( p = 0.0049).
2 a), and differences among feeding groups were highly significant (ANOVA F 7, 88 = 292, P < 0.0001 for FB NY ; F 6, 54 = 204, P < 0.0001 for MC SC ).
S3 ; Table S9 ) and highly significant ( P < .0001) association with skin microbiome dissimilarity across all beta-diversity metrics.
However, the corresponding global F ST was highly significant ( p < .0001), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) did not include 0 (0.00435–0.00828), indicating the presence of genetic structuring across the study area.
The log-likelihood ratio tests indicated that both group and kin effects were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
6 C,F, Movie 3 ) mutant bristles, highly significant deviations ( F 12,635 =56.09, P <0.0001) in angle distribution were recorded.
The increase was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 analysis for trend age vs. hypertension: P < 0.0001 in both sexes).
Kruskal-Wallis analysis revealed a highly significant difference among groups (H = 23.14, p < 0.0001).
Such a non-uniform distribution is highly significant ( P <0.0001, Fisher exact test (75, 151; 204, 22)).
Our model results showed a highly significant interaction (χ 2 = 94.3, P < .0001) [ 27 ], confirming a difference in patterns of deferral by CD4 count and patient type.
It turns out that all profile 4 insertion sites are close to Met4-targeted genes (average distance 1.4 kb), which is highly significant comparing with random sites (p-value < 10 −4 ; Fig 4A , S5 Fig ; Methods).
A linear mixed-effects model with stimulation rate and pulse shape (rampUp and rampDown) as fixed factors and subject as random factor reported a highly significant effect of rate ( F (1,117) = 478.44, p < .0001) but not of shape ( F (1,117) = 0.05, p = .8154) or the interaction between rate and shape ( F (1,117) = 0.03, p = .8559) on the angle.
Inhibition of ribosome-bound PYK-F activity became highly significant ( p < 0.0001, d > 2.0) at a Cam concentration of 2× (70 μg/mL).
This is a highly significant difference, as compared to the 49% de novo CNVs in vivo (p < 0.0001, binomial test).
The difference between the mean radiation-induced G2 scores for 0.05 Gy compared to 0.5 Gy in this cohort were highly significant (two-tailed p value < 0.0001) by the Mann–Whitney test and this is also illustrated in Figure 1 for both doses in the healthy control donors.
The model was highly significant: χ 2 (17) = 188, p < 0.0001, pseudo-R 2 = 15%.
Multiple linear regression model fits and β coefficients for V R were highly significant for each of the intelligibility indices and were best for RT 60 (R 2 = 0.666, F(2, 37) = 39.9, P < .0001).
The difference between p35S : cOBE3 wus-1/+ and empty vector wus-1/+ control is highly significant in both seedling and shoot stages (both Chi square, p<0.0001).
It is striking that the 20 and 30 min contingency tables are very highly significant with P < 0.0001.
The difference between syntenic and non-syntenic genes was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for all species separately.