Furthermore, Malat1 expression exhibited a 1.46-fold increase compared to the ODM group ( Figure 5 C), which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Statistical analysis using the chi-square test demonstrated a highly significant association between gestational age and birth weight ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
This contrast turned out to be highly significant, F (1,78) = 3,298.45, p < 0.0001.
By applying a paired t test, the differences between the WN and RNN model to the TAtt model were shown to be both highly significant with p ≤ 0.0001 across subjects (Cohen’s d = 10.68 and d = 10.66, respectively).
We found highly significant elevations in AST, ALT, and total bilirubin levels (109.96 U/L, 70.17 U/L and 1.25 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.0001) in group 3 rats after they were treated with 40% ethanol only compared with the control group.
The overall concordance between the two methods in detecting JCV was statistically highly significant (p=0.0001) with a kappa value of 0.659.
In addition, all measurements of Q A redox state and g s in all lines could be described by a single highly significant positive correlation ( P < 0.0001, ANOVA; Fig. 1h ), consistent with a role for Q A redox state as an early determinant for stomatal opening in response to light intensity 17 .
All quadratic terms were similarly highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with glycerol 2 (F = 197.9) being the strongest factor, followed by peptone 2 (F = 221.5) and pH 2 (F = 181), suggesting a curvilinear parameter–pyocyanin yield relationship in each case.
Statistical analysis using an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).
Following stimulation with CMV pp65, correlations were highly significant for IFN-γ and IL-21 ( r = 0.53, p < 0.0001) and IL-22 and perforin ( r = 0.50, p = 0.001) ( Figure 3 a).
Determinants of TRAP AUC For AUC04 and AUC06, insulin was strongly positively associated with TRAP, with a modest negative association between TRAP and glucose and a weak association between TRAP and vitamin C, with the overall models being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and explaining about 32% of the variation in TRAP.
IAb levels from the confirmatory visit for all three IAb types were highly significant ( p <0.0001) with ORs of 1.36 (95% CI 1.25, 1.47), 1.32 (95% CI 1.22, 1.44) and 1.15 (95% CI 1.07, 1.24) for IA-2A, GADA and IAA, respectively.
The chi-square test of likelihood ratio was highly significant (χ2 = 782.15, p < 0.0001), indicating the model’s overall fitness.
The backward logistic regression model ( Table 3 ) showed that the model was highly significant (p <0.0001, R squared 0.46).
By week 1, a marked reduction was observed in the Col/Cs group (mean ± SD: ~630 HU), while the control group retained higher BMD levels (mean ± SD: ~760 HU), yielding a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
These plots display that while cadence is not different between TD and CPH groups, there was a 22.0% decrease in walking speed in the CPH group ( P < 0.0001) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) increases in knee flexion in stance phase (21.57° increase in CPH), swing phase (14.57° increase in CPH), initial contact (IC) (35.53° increase in CPH) and overall (18.58° increase in CPH) ( Fig. 6C and D ).
The results in Table 1 showed a highly significant increase in oral body temperature among the exposed group (the bakers) compared to the control group (p < 0.0001).
The model F -value was found to be 2280.92, which indicates that the model is highly significant and has a low probability value ( p < 0.0001).
As shown in Figure 3B , the addition of CypA or CypB resulted in a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) in the refolding of the acid-denatured GFP confirming their true enzymatic activity.
Effect of Amplitude and Time on Total Phenolic Content and Anthocyanins The linear amplitude term (β 1 ) for the extraction of TPC was significant at p < 0.01, while the quadratic terms for amplitude and time (β 11 , β 22 , respectively) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.0689 > 0.05).
Comparison across CAD categories using the Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated a highly significant difference in daily effort scores (H = 85.82, p < 0.0001).
Treatment was highly significant for TMAO concentrations ( P < 0.0001) and yields ( P < 0.0001), where colostrum from both CHOL45 and CHOL30 cows had greater concentrations (both comparisons, P < 0.0001) and yields (both comparisons, P < 0.01) than CON.
of borderline significancep = 0.05
Within group follow-up comparisons revealed that the LPC was highly significant in the CN group [ t (33) = 5.2, p < 0.0001], but of borderline significance in the a-MCI patients [ t (23) = 2.1, p = 0.05].
However, it should not pass without notice that many of the incremental reductions in Table 4 are highly significant ( p < .0001) up to about n -5.