“highly significant”

Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001; Mann–Whitney) were seen between concentrations of these variables in patients with metastatic disease compared with localised disease ( Figure 1 ) with median values (IQR) respectively of 22.2 (4.2–111) vs 5.7 (0.6–11.5) mg l −1 for CRP, 189.2 (114.8–303.4) vs 82.3 (575.5–131.1) μ g l −1 for OPN and 186.4 (89.6–336.2) vs 102.5 (61.6–153.9) μ g l −1 for CA9.

cerevisiae ARSs and this degree of overlap is highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001, permutation test, see Methods) (Supplemental Data set S5).

A highly significant difference in Lp (a) levels was observed between normal coronaries vs. single-vessel disease, double-and triple-vessel disease ( P < 0.0001).

All these parameters exhibited a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the right and left eye.

Highly significant association was found between naive CD4 T cells and CD4+ RTE (all p-values <0.0001).

We revealed a statistically highly significant difference in mean gingival index mean between miswak and CHX mouthwashes, which decreased from 2.2 to 1.2 (p = 0.0001), and chlorhexidine mouthwash, which decreased from 2.13 to 0.87 (p = 0.0001) for the same index.

Employment status was highly significant (p < 0.0001), with unemployed individuals more likely to experience pain (63.1%) than those employed (42.7%).

These group differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Differences among median results obtained at the three times of observation were all highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Figure 1 A).

We then confirmed the intergroup similarity by the highly significant correlations for the normal and LPMC/F3 groups (within: R S = 0.87, n = 27, P < 0.0001; between: R S = 0.75, n = 64, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ), as well as for the normal and extra groups (within: R S = 0.76, P < 0.0001; between: R S = 0.66, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 D ).

Applying the aforementioned post hoc ANCOVA sensitivity analysis, the treatment effect defined by the primary outcome measure remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

/ di /-repetition) and Violation Type (single/double) yielded a highly significant main effect of Violation Type, F (1,38) =43.2, p <.0001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}${\eta _{p}^{2}} = .5319$\end{document} η p 2 = .5319 , as double violations were more often rejected than single violations.

We found a highly significant lower frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific TNF+CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ( p < 0.0001) correlated with increasing BMI category (Supplementary Table 11 ; ANOVA for general linear models with adjustment for covariates), as well as trends of lower SARS-CoV-2-specific IL-2+CD4+T cells and higher CRP ( p ≤ 0.014, q < 0.156).

All of the above findings were highly significant and had P < 0.0001 values [ 38 ].

All intergroup differences were highly significant (****, p < 0.0001).

We found that the neutralizing ability against EBV infection of epithelial cells was in highly significant correlation with the levels of gH/gL IgG (Pearson = 0.5448, P < 0.0001) and gB IgG (Pearson = 0.4371, P = 0.0005, Fig. 3A ).

The regression models were both found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001), while the values for lack of fit values were not significant (p > 0.05), confirming the model fitness to produce predictions for optimal hydrolysis conditions.

We also observed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) co-expression of IGF-IRa1 and IGF-IRa2 ( Fig. 4B,D ), as observed in different tissues.

Hematology The GD0 group exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase in Hb levels, with a change of 3.70% compared to the control.

Despite these adjustments, all the RRs for mental disorders in the presence of abortion in these data are substantial and highly significant at p < 0.0001.

Overall, differences in species richness between elevational zones <2000 m were highly significant (ANOVA, F = 244.04, P <0.0001).

A linear regressing analysis was also performed on the data from the HT assay and AHT device ( Figure 3 B), which demonstrated a highly significant correlation coefficient close to one ( R 2 = 0.998, p < 0.0001).

This revealed a highly significant difference in the frequency of the three genotypes between the dead and alive mosquitoes (chi-square = 28.8; p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 ).

Quantitative analysis confirmed highly significant differences between NPM1wt and NPM1c+ cells in nucleolar rim intensity ( P =0.0001) ( Fig. 3B ) and nucleolar circularity ( P <0.0001) ( Fig. 3C ).

Modeling and evaluation of LSA and iso-LSA yield responses ANOVA revealed that all models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).