“highly significant”

Results A systematic retrospective analysis of the mapping performance comparing the operator with simulated search processes by the algorithm within 17 electroanatomic maps of focal spreading arrhythmias revealed a highly significant reduction of necessary LAT measurements from 55 ± 8.8 to 10 ± 0.51 (n = 17; P < .0001).

Notably, the interaction between miR - 146a rs2910164 and rs57095329 was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) across several genotype combination levels, conferring a 10- to 100-fold reduced risk of MS. miR - 146a rs57095329 showed significant interactions with IRAK-1 rs3027898 and miR-155 rs767649 ( P < 0.05, before Bonferroni correction).

However, a highly significant and positive relationship was recorded between COVID-19 knowledge ( r =0.90, p <0.0001) and awareness ( r =0.65, p <0.0001), and preventive practice of FCSW, respectively.

By correlating the immunohistochemical results with clinicopathological data, we demonstrated a highly significant correlation of NRF2 high and AKR1C3 high tumors with worse overall survival (OS) ( p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively) ( Table 1 and Table S1 ).

Tiger caregivers in private facilities all had direct contact with the young tigers provided for the tourists, whereas none of the caregivers in government facilities had direct contact with tigers: a highly significant difference despite the small number of tiger caregivers ( p < 0.0001).

The outcomes were again highly significant: respectively F (1, 43) = 61.45, p < 0.0001, and F (1, 43) = 81.18, p < 0.0001 and the correlations ( r 2 ) are moderate to strong (see Table 3 ). 4.

There is a highly significant correlation between the two measures ( R = 0.66; P < 0.0001) (Additional file 1 : Figure S4); whilst this is not a strong relationship, it is consistent with previous observations between these two measures ( R = 0.61) [ 6 ].

The variance of the random effect was highly significant in all these models (p<0.0001).

A Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient between marks generated by Ebel and MH standard setting is highly significant ( r = 0.9998, n = 262, p < .0001).

The analysis revealed highly significant main effects of PCA concentration (F4,40 = 550.59, P < 0.0001) and fungal species (F3,40 = 30.32, P < 0.0001).

n = 508, 53.0%); this was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001).

We have been able to detect a significantly larger signal for aluminum abundance in AD temporal lobe neocortex ranging from 6–9-fold over age and gender-matched healthy controls and the results are highly significant ( p <0.0001, ANOVA).

The model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.353, F (5, 57) = 6.22, p = 0.0001).

Pilot studies indicated a lack of need for higher BSO concentrations to achieve highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increases in ROS levels.

Whereas only a marginally significant increase in the bullying of secularists versus Islamists was reported in the private sector ( F [1,27] = 4.17, p = .05), a highly significant increase in the bullying of secularists versus Islamists was reported in the public sector: F (1,27) = 19.04, p < .0001.

Differences were considered to be significant at different p -values: p > 0.05 was considered non-significant, p < 0.05 (*) significant, p < 0.01 (**) very significant, p < 0.001 (***) highly significant, and p < 0.0001 (****) extremely significant. 3.

Nevertheless, there was a highly significant difference in the duration of hospital stay between the two groups (drain group, 4.00 ± 1.35 days versus no-drain group, 2.80 ± 0.83 days; P < 0.0001).

This separation is highly significant ( p < 10 −4 , permutation test, see Materials and Methods).

Taken together, the BoAstV CH13/NeuroS1 infection that we detected by ISH and IHC in approximately 1/3 of cattle diagnosed with non-suppurative encephalitis, while negative controls remained unstained, clearly shows a correlation with the disease, which is supported by an extremely highly significant statistical correlation (two-tailed p < 0.0001). 3.2.

Comparison between the maximum ratio observed in control and mutant animals showed that this difference in cyt/nuc ratio was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001)( Fig 3F ).

The overall differences were highly significant: Wilks’ Lambda: 0.02 ~ F 168,1549 = 7.26 P < 0.0001, and the squared Mahalanobis distances provided the specific P -values between groups ( Table 2 ).

This difference in the proportion of step vocalizations was highly significant (chi2 = 400.42, df = 1, p<0.0001).

The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Most of the 17 spruce species had a ground diameter of approximately 2 cm, still, the differences among species were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the basal diameters ( BD 6 ) of P. meyeri and P. schrenkiana were relatively small, showing poor environmental adaptability (Fig. 3 B).

Figure 2B illustrates the comparison of true versus predicted ages, yielding a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.56 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).