Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using RT–qPCR primers that distinguish wild type (WT) and KCNQ2 ∆E5 , we found a highly significant difference, with KCNQ2 ∆E5 detected exclusively in patient samples ( P < 0.0001 adjusting for age, sex and RNA integrity number (RIN); Supplementary Table 2 ), while the levels of WT KCNQ2 transcript were not different ( P = 0.9947 adjusting for age, sex and RIN; Supplementary Table 2 ) (Fig. 2f,g ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although, the fit for regression equation was poor for maize (R 2 = 0.14) and rice (R 2 = 0.16), and was moderate for soybean (R 2 = 0.35), these regressions were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and indicate that the predictor variables still provide information about the response even though data points fall further from the regression line.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The data presented in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) demonstrates that there was a highly significant increase in the expression of miR-181a-5p (4.56 ± 0.92-fold change, p < 0.0001) and miR-125b-2-3p (6.39 ± 0.68-fold change, p < 0.0001) in maternal peripheral blood of the RH-HDFN group compared with the control group.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Whereas the original data analysis reported a highly significant effect ( P < 0.0001), generalized mixed-effects models with a random effect for name indicates that the effect is not robust, neither with the data from the general public (b = −0.108 [log odd units], z = −1.712, P = 0.087) nor with the data from elected officials (b = −0.065, z = −1.432, P = 0.155). * While this does not mean that we should accept the null hypothesis, it shows that the study is underpowered.