“highly significant”

This increase was highly significant with P < 0.0001 (paired Student's t -test).

However, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) was observed between mild and severe psoriasis.

The deviations between the torsional spaces covered are highly significant for almost all maps (p-value < 0.0001), with significantly higher mean distance-to-centroid for all MD maps (see also Additional file 1 : Table S4).

A linear regression, regressing CV on year, was highly significant ( β = 0.0043 [CI = 0.0035–0.0051, P < 0.0001]) (Table 2 and Fig. 1 ).

A highly significant level of concordance was observed between qPCR and ddPCR (r = 0.94, P <0.0001; 95% CI, 0.94–0.97), with 189 of 222 samples (85.1%) fully concordant.

Parental obesity was a highly significant cross-sectional correlate of offspring BMI (β regression coefficient per one parent with obesity β = 0.86 [SE 0.11], P < 0.0001).

Results: Highly significant differences (p<0.0001) were observed between all four groups during intragroup comparison for qualitative assay.

These characteristic changes in distribution were observed throughout many bacterial species, most being highly significant (marked *** for p < 0.0001).

Box-Behnken design analysis yielded a highly significant quadratic model ( P < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.5929), indicating excellent model adequacy and reliability (R 2 = 0.9962).

In contrast, the p-value for the chi-square test comparing diabetics and non-diabetics with respect to health conditions was highly significant (p<0.0001), indicating that the difference in the distribution of health conditions between diabetics and non-diabetics was statistically significant.

Likewise, the difference between the T1/T2 and T3/T4 groups was highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

The cut-off value was 3.8 ng/ml, and the difference between the groups was highly significant (p< 0.0001).

The main effect of strain was highly significant ( F 35,119 = 5.909, p < .0001).

Ordinary one-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the four severity groups for all three proteins (all P < 0.0001).

27/30 (90%) of their variants were also reported as such by our model and 29/40 (73%) were reported as invariant by our model, a highly significant correlation (Fisher's exact test p < 0.0001).

The preference of aroma of feeding males was highly significant (G = 22.64, p < 0.0001 by males and G = 48.50, p < 0.0001 by females) by both sexes ( Figure 1 ).

Following treatment, anastrozole (1 and 10 mg) markedly inhibited peripheral aromatase in all patients (the difference between pre- and on-treatment values being highly significant P <0.0001).

In a univariate logistic regression, we observed a highly significant positive association between the composite index score and the likelihood of aflatoxin detection (OR 1.6, p < 0.0001).

Comparing the survival rates of patients with different histopathological tumor gradings showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).

As presented in Table 4 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( p = 0.0913).

Differences between gray and white matter were highly significant (p < 0.0001), and epileptogenic zones showed significantly higher conductivity than healthy gray matter (p = 0.012), even when MRI was normal (p = 0.005).

The mean and median levels of uPA as determined by both ELISAs were similar. However, the mean and median PAI-1 levels assessed by the two ELISAs differed by a factor of 10, the in-house ELISA measuring values ten times lower than the ELISA with commercial reagents. The overall association between the two ELISA methods is demonstrated by the highly significant correlations between the cytosolic levels of uPA (rs = 0.85, P < 0.0001) and of PAI-1 (rs = 0.90, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1A and B).

Mean itch intensity was 50.6% ± 3.5% during the 25°C block (intervals 6-10) and 33.8% ± 3.9% during the 32°C block (intervals 1-5) with a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001) between the 2 temperature blocks (Figure 1 ).

Additionally, the Q-statistic was highly significant [Q(6) = 587.82, p < 0.0001], further confirming that the observed variation is unlikely to be due to chance alone.

Eosinophil count reduction was higher in group B (96.1%) as compared with group C (85.4%) and group A (66.3%), with highly significant ( P = 0.0001) differences.