Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It is also plausible that these inconsistent results are due to the relatively small sample size in MRI studies, as a related clinical study from TREND with a much larger sample size ( N = 661) revealed a highly significant and slightly stronger correlation between TMT B-A and DT gait speed while subtracting ( p < 0.0001, r = 0.27) ( Hobert et al., 2017 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the active rTMS group, the mean number of correct answers on the PRM test increased by 4.54 ± 2.98 from baseline to week 8, while the correct number in the sham group decreased slightly (-0.92 ± 2.72) and the difference between these changes was highly significant (mean 5.46 ± 0.92, 95%CI: 3.43–7.14, F = 33.3, df = 137, P < 0.0001, effect size = 0.474) (Table 2 ).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lastly, analysis of the relative usage of pAs in 182 genes that displayed significant modulation of at least two alternative pAs ( Supplementary Table S7 ) highlighted a highly significant negative correlation between the abundance of the two APA isoforms for most genes (92.85%; r = –0.8936, P <0.0001, Pearson correlation; Figure 2F ), thus confirming the effect on transcript lengthening induced by HT.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant reduction in ovary mass (linear mixed model; t = − 4.37, df = 104, p < 0.0001) in failed queens across surveys (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. 1 a), indicating that small ovaries are a widespread phenotype associated with poor fecundity, as described by beekeepers.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference in SHM in the long prime (week 29) versus 10 week prime was highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by Mann–Whitney, Fig. 4b ; P < 0.0009, Fig. 4c ), and the difference in median mutations between weeks 10 and 29 was as great as that between weeks 4 and 10, indicative of robust GC functionality continuing through to at least week 29 (Fig. 4a–c ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In both the citalopram and pramipexole groups, the BDI score showed a highly significant decrease with a large effect size ( r ≥ 0.6) analyzed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( Z = −4.018, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.877 for citalopram group and Z = −3.926, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.878 for pramipexole group).