“highly significant”

NM_011979 ) showed a highly significant (P < 0.0001) 12-fold difference in mRNA expression level between A/J and AcB55 (AcB55 > A/J; Fig. 2 , boxed area).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the reduced model was highly significant (F = 68.41, p < 0.0001), indicating adequate representation of the relationship between factors and response (Table 2 ).

Although there was no significant difference between the strains in the accumulation of mitochondrial point mutations in untreated cultures, upon irradiation, even at the lowest UV dose of 5 J/m 2 pol30-K164R cultures exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase of mitochondrial point mutations in relation to their POL30 + counterparts at the same dose (Fig. 3 c).

Interleukin 6 in urine showed a significant increase after N 2 exposure and a mild decrease after He exposure, resulting in a highly significant difference for interleukin 6 production between N 2 and He after exposure ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 ). 2.5.

The resulting quadratic model was statistically robust (R 2 = 0.874; adjusted R 2 = 0.845; p < 0.0001), with DNA:PEI ratio emerging as the dominant determinant of titre, supported by highly significant linear ( p < 0.0001) and quadratic ( p = 0.00028) terms.

Quantitation of total tube length showed a highly significant and robust increase above that of controls going from 1.46 ± 0.5 mm in untreated cells to 5.46 ± 1.4 mm in Dsi2‐treated cells ( P < 0.0001; Figure 3 A), representing nearly a three fold increase.

The difference between these means is highly significant (n = 28; P<0.0001, paired t test, two tailed).

Because the hand was travelling in a predominantly rightwards direction at cue onset (with the average speed in that direction 760% greater than upwards, and 490% greater than forwards), we expect the errors to be most prominent in azimuth angle ( Figure 1 B) For stimulation over the cerebellum, the 5.13° (±0.48° SEM) difference in azimuth was highly significant ( Figure 4 A, one-sample t -test, t (32)=10.58, p < 0.0001).

The Y 1 regression model had a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) effect on the primary term B, a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on A, C, AC., and B.C., and a non-significant ( p > 0.05) effect on AB., A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 .

The model was found to be highly significant, as evidenced by the results of an F-test, which gave an F-value of 1655.45 ( p < 0.0001).

This number is substantially less than the 1089 genes identified as belonging to the crp meta-regulon, and the discrepancy between observed and expected proportions is highly significant based on a binomial test ( p < 0.0001).

The rate of perinatal death was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001) with the number of children a woman had in both survey rounds.

Compared with the control group, the 1 μM-treated group showed a significant reduction in viability ( p < 0.05), whereas the 2 μM-treated group exhibited a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001), as well as a significant reduction compared with the 1 μM-treated group ( p < 0.05).

Serum GSH-PX activity increased in all Ef026-treated groups after 8 weeks, with group IV displaying a highly significant enhancement ( P < 0.0001) compared to the control ( Fig. 1 B). ​By the trial’s conclusion, group III also exhibited markedly higher GSH-PX activity than the control ( P < 0.01).

For both Para and non-disabled datasets, highly significant correlations were found for all peak and average HHD values (all above r = 0.95, p < 0.0001), and many of the strength measures were significantly correlated (r > 0.7, p < 0.01), except for hip external rotation.

For instance, for the 2.5% trials with the lowest OpticF, a regression of the L F P 4 − 16 H z power on Synch had an R 2 = 0.096 which was highly significant ( t -test p < 0.0001 ).

For benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), the test indicated a highly significant difference (H = 48.21, p < 0.0001), with smoked sausages exhibiting the highest concentrations, followed by dry-cured ham and smoked bacon.

However, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) was observed between mild and severe psoriasis.

This difference in the proportion of step vocalizations was highly significant (chi2 = 400.42, df = 1, p<0.0001).

For the SIADH/cancer subgroup, subjects on tolvaptan exhibited a highly significant improvement in this parameter ( P < 0.0001) relative to placebo to day 4 (5.0 vs. −0.3 mEq/mL) and to day 30 (6.9 vs. 1.0 mEq/L) (Fig. 2 ).

Analysis using a reduced quadratic model showed that the model was highly significant, with an F-value of 17.86 ( p < 0.0001).

The mean and median levels of uPA as determined by both ELISAs were similar. However, the mean and median PAI-1 levels assessed by the two ELISAs differed by a factor of 10, the in-house ELISA measuring values ten times lower than the ELISA with commercial reagents. The overall association between the two ELISA methods is demonstrated by the highly significant correlations between the cytosolic levels of uPA (rs = 0.85, P < 0.0001) and of PAI-1 (rs = 0.90, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1A and B).

Nine out of 11 patients with positive cath BT-I but negative cath BH-I died in a 5-year observation period (--) but only seven out of 37 patients with negative cath BT-I and positive cath BH-I - expression died (----), the difference being highly significant (P < 0.0001).

In our population of 50 patients, corresponding to 80 blood samples, with various types of advanced cancer, a highly significant correlation between platelet number and serum VEGF concentration was found (r = 0.61; P < 10-4).

S3 and S5 gave highly significant increase in solubility with p < 0.0001 with no significant difference between them ( p = 0.6891, > 0.05), which means this method was more efficient in the complex formation.