Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP value < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The mean pretest score was 15.36 (SD 1.79), which had risen post-test to a mean of 17.16 (SD 1.59), and the calculated two-tailed P value suggested improvement in the post-workshop score, which was highly significant ( P value < 0.000; 95% CI -2.46 to -1.14).
highly significantp < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The ROC derived from the prediction model yielded an area under the curve of 0.70, slightly higher than the ROC of the 10th percentile cut-off. Discussion The association between blink rate and DIP and UPDRS score in patients with SMI is highly significant ( p < 0.000).
highly significantP = 0.0000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
morrilli populations Exact tests (simultaneous analysis) for population differentiation indicated that highly significant differences in marker frequencies existed among the G. morrilli populations ( χ 2 = 400.8; df = 50; P = 0.0000) (Table 1) .
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The Welch’s ANOVA test applied on data with unequal variances (Levene’s test at α = 0.05) shows highly significant differences (F = 24.99; α = 0.001; p = 0.000) between the mean values of tested groups for data sets collected in the 5–7 July period, as well as significant differences but not highly significant (F = 9.81; α = 0.001; p = 0.002) between the tested groups for data sets collected in the 16–18 August period.
highly significantP =0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Comparisons of PANSS scores before and after antipsychotic treatment in RTG and TATG Time point (baseline, and after 4 or 12 weeks of treatment) was the within-subject factor, and time point × group (RTG and TATG) was the between-subject factor, in a repeated measures ANOVA, which revealed a highly significant main effect of time period for total PANSS score ( F =420, df =2, P =0.000), positive symptom score ( F =213, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.30), negative symptom score ( F =186, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.23), and total psychopathology score ( F =167, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.19).
highly significantp = 0.00a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Highly significant differences in favor of MEBO group were observed in the case of medical visits (€4.28 versus €5.67, p = 0.00) hospitalization costs (418.48 versus 496.25, p = 0.01) and costs of analgesics (€0.10 versus €0.18 p = 0.00).
highly significantP=0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
In the repeated measures ANOVA for SANS total score, both the main effect of group (F=6.82, P=0.013) and the main effect of time (F=12.63, P=0.000) were significant, and the interaction between group and time was highly significant (F=11.19, P=0.000).
highly significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The mean value of the responses to the questions related to the overall experience of the pain before visiting the pain clinic was 3.81 ± 1.42 and after visiting the pain clinic was 2.14 ± 1.05 which was highly significant ( P = 0.000).