“highly significant”

The AHI showed the most prominent group difference (Wilcoxon-Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was highly significant with chi 2 = 22, df = 3 p < 0.0001) with severely lower event rates in the LTG (9.45/h) compared to POAG (22.7/h) and controls (21.9/h; p < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively).

However, some weakly significant correlations were seen between the T cell response and the IgG2 response, with one highly significant correlation at week 8 (r 2 = 0.14, p < 0.0001).

With ‘batch’ included as an independent variable, the effect of training is minimal ( P = 0.33), whereas omission of ‘batch’ altogether leads to a highly significant effect of training ( P < 0.0001).

Linear regression of bill length versus PC1 of seasonality was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001; R 2 = 0.44; Fig. 4 ).

This difference was highly significant ( P < .0001).

The identities of cell-to-cell commonly expressed genes in each species show highly significant overlap (random sampling p < 10 −4 ; Fig. 2c, d ).

As the tumor sets were very large, statistical differences between the ERG positive and negative groups were still highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 ).

A paired t test revealed a statistically highly significant (p<0.0001) difference between lesion and reference values (t = 6.638, sample size 32).

The means and standard errors of RDS of Hitomebore and Kele by cut-panicle inoculation were 82.4 ± 15.4% and 30.6 ± 4.4%, respectively, and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results showed that the regression model is highly significant, with an F-value of 302.13 and p < 0.0001, while the lack-of-fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating good agreement between predicted and experimental values ( Table 6 ).

All clinical outcome scores except for the FJS-12 reflected excellent results with highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between the preoperative and postoperative follow-up scores.

8.5 for ICG; both p < 0.0001), an association that remained highly significant for IMP after controlling for ICG recommendations in a multivariate analysis (adjusted OR = 35.8, p < 0.0001 for IMP vs. 2.5, p = 0.066 for ICG).

The statistical difference was also highly significant (Newman–Keuls; p < 0.0001) between samples from Group C and those from Group L while the difference between group S and the group L was not statistically significant ( Table 5 ).

This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.

In all the models considered at any step, both predictors describing Zebra Mussel occurrence (Dpa and Dpd) were highly significant, implying the strong dependence of Scaup density on the extent of occurrence and density of Zebra Mussels (in the final model Dpa: edf = 2.104, F = 14.532, p < 0.0001, Dpd: edf = 2.546, F = 4.844, p = 0.0048).

It also displayed blood culture to be highly significant in the diagnosis of typhoid fever (p<0.0001).

A Fisher's exact test shows highly significant association (p < 0.0001) between the probability of a reaction failing or succeeding (despite low DNA yield) in the final pPCR reaction given results of previous reactions.

PTEN Deletion Correlated With Pathology Stage, Extracapsular Extension, and Seminal Vesicle Invasion PTEN deletion status showed a highly significant correlation with pathologic stage ( P < 0.0001).

Repeated measures analysis showed a highly significant time effect on insulin levels in both male and female ( P < 0.0001).

A repeated measures ANOVA of attractiveness ratings for covered, partially covered, and uncovered displays with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed a highly significant main effect, F (1.27, 75.04) = 23.99, p < .0001, η p 2 = .29.

Nonetheless, we performed a post hoc examination of their correlation with CTF scores (see Table 5 ) which found consistent, highly significant ( P < 0.0001) moderate correlations ranging from 0.37 to 0.55.

The Gompertz curve fitted to the entire data set was highly significant ( F = 5127.5, P > 0.0001, df = 2, 107) and accounted for 99% of the total variation in the data ( Table 2 ).

The overall trend was highly significant (p = 0.0001).

Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability The power spectral analysis revealed significant difference ( p = 0.045) for LF power and highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) for both HF power and LF/HF power ratio.

The geographic smooth term explained the largest proportion of total variance and was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in all years.