“highly significant”

There was a highly significant difference between the South District and each of the five other districts (p < 0.0001) as follows: Jerusalem (IRR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.14–0.29), North (IRR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12–0.22), Haifa (IRR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.11–0.27), Center (IRR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07–0.23), and Tel Aviv (IRR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01–0.44).

Similarly, the PL of HAdV viremia was also associated with non-relapse mortality, albeit with less pronounced significance ( p = 0.013, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6), and revealed a highly significant correlation with HAdV-related mortality ( p = 0.0001, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.2).

The P values remained highly significant for NRS ( P <0.0001), VAS ( P <0.0001), BPI-MSF ( P = 0.001), and PDQ ( P = 0.02), while the P values for ≥30% pain reduction ( P = 0.27) and ≥50% pain reduction ( P = 0.02) were also consistent with the primary analyses.

When WT ovules were used, 59% of the assays showed pollen tubes growing toward WT ovules ( n =80), while only 10% of the pollen tubes grew toward the Scfrk1 -S1 ovules ( n =60), giving a highly significant P <0.0001 value in a two-sample binomial test.

This analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between HLA-presentation and the abundance of the source proteins ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ).

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

In a repeated measures ANOVA analysis this was highly significant ( P <0.0001) for a genotype effect on lean mass in grams in males and females ( Fig. 3B and Table 2 ).

The obtained mathematical model of TI was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

parasuis field isolates, a highly significant protection was conferred by the vaccination in the survival rate ( p < 0.0001), regardless of G. parasuis TbpB cluster and SV, since all non-immunized piglets died within the initial three days post-infection (dpi) (Table 2 ).

In the present study, untreated diabetic animals (Group II) exhibited a marked increase in water intake, reaching mean values of 31.2 ± 9.4 mL/day, compared to 10.8 ± 3.2 mL/day in the normal control group (Group I), the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The results revealed that plunge depth (B) had the most pronounced effect on load capacity, with a highly significant result (F = 685.80, p < 0.0001).

The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).

Results The random effect on our logistic regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), suggesting that subjects varied in their musicality ratings of original order vs. temporally randomized songs of this sample of avian species.

The difference between the distribution of both normal and degraded mitochondria and dinoflagellates in control and heat-treated anemones were highly significant in all 6 scenarios (χ 2 (1) values not shown for each comparison, but all P>0.0001; Figure 6 ).

Temperature had a highly significant impact on the pH value of the silage feed ( p < 0.0001).

The F-value derived from the F-test, amounting to 47.68, signifies a highly significant model (*** P < 0.0001).

The difference in agreement between the two conditions was highly significant ( t ⁢ ( 198 ) = 22.28 , p < .0001 , d = 3.15 ).

A highly significant main effect of trial type was also observed, F(2, 368) = 94.10, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.34, demonstrating that the type of trial accounted for a substantial proportion of the variance in 1/f slope modulation.

This difference is highly significant with a p -value < 0.0001.

Mean explained variance across subjects peaked 156 ms after stimulus onset ( r 2 = 0.65, mean p < 0.0001, Bonferroni-corrected; Figure 6A ); peak values for individual subjects ranged between r 2 = 0.49–0.85 at 144–168 ms after stimulus-onset and were all highly significant (all p < 0.0001).

Overall, AMOVA revealed a highly significant genetic variation among populations ( P < 0.0001; Table 4 ) accounting for 13.5% of the total variation.

Upon review of the unblinded data, the independent data monitoring committee observed a highly significant improvement in the primary endpoint ( p < 0.0001), along with favourable trends across multiple secondary endpoints, and recommended stopping the study in October 2023.

Effect of Process Variables on Sphericity Factor and Roundness Table 2 shows that both the sphericity factor and roundness were significantly influenced by the independent variables with highly significant regression models ( p < 0.0001), high coefficients of determination (R 2 > 0.98) and non-significant lack of fit ( p > 0.05).

0153), becoming highly significant at the end of the diet ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1A ).

Importantly, when we analysed half-life across all infections (treated and untreated), there was a highly significant interaction between the effect of drug treatment and parasite genotype ( = 9.10, P < 0.0001; compare Fig. 2 B,C; Table S1.5 ), as well as significant negative correlations with pre-peak growth rate and parasite density at peak (which were independent of differences between parasite lines) (intrinsic growth rate = 4.15, P = 0.049; density at peak = 9.48, P < 0.005; Table S1.5 ).