Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0·00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When the eight single‐genotype variants were combined and compared against the WT parental virus treatment, there was a highly significant difference between the two types of virus treatments, that is multiple‐genotype WT vs. single‐genotype variants (treatment: χ 1 2 = 24·81, P < 0·0001), with the slope of the relationship between virus dose and virus‐induced mortality being steeper for the WT virus (log 10 dose × variant: χ 1 2 = 4·66, P = 0·025).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference in rates between officers and enlisted personnel was highly significant for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and the aggregate of all forms of viral hepatitis (P < 0.0001) but was not significant for hepatitis, type unspecified (P = 0.099).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Repeatabilities (intra-class correlation coefficients, r 1 ) of FAs calculated from mammograms were calculated on a random sub-set of 20 mammograms from the study and showed highly significant r 1 values (repeated measures ANOVA, 20 sets of mammograms, FA breast width r 1 0.98, p = 0.0001; FA breast height r 1 0.86, p = 0.0001).
Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res · 2006 · PMC1557716
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis showed highly significant differences between Alström syndrome diabetic and young-onset type 2 diabetic patients with respect to presence of neuropathic symptoms ( P < 0.0001), absence of vibration perception ( P = 0.004), and mean lightest perceived monofilament ( P = 0.00001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This analysis included > 300 families homologous to multi-pathway proteins and > 600 families homologous to other proteins, and revealed that the average frequencies of both insertions and deletions of the multi-pathway families were ~30% higher than those of others (insertions: 3.01 versus 2.42; deletions: 8.79 versus 6.29) (Additional file 4 ) and the differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001; T-test).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.