“highly significant”

The positive relationship of age with plasma normetanephrine remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( p <0.0001), showing high breast cancer risk among post-menopausal females.

cerevisiae ARSs and this degree of overlap is highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001, permutation test, see Methods) (Supplemental Data set S5).

However, at 39°C, the frequency of the S686G virus gradually decreased with passage number (48.6% in inoculum vs 29.1% at passage 3), the trend being highly significant (general linear model: P < 0.0001).

C 50.3 ng/ml, 95% CI, 2.1–98.6 ng/ml, P = 0.042, Tukey’s HSD test), and highly significant differences in phase III, during surgery and after surgical resection of the main tumour mass (P = 0.0001, n = 28, mean difference M vs.

Box plots for the results of A , showing highly significant difference ( p <0.0001).

The greater horn of the hyoid bone provides an insertion to the middle constrictor muscle, which forms the lateral wall of the hypopharynx. 8 We reported a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) in all registered criteria postoperatively, reflecting how effective the used procedures were.

The observed alterations regarding the differences in circumference were highly significant, showing an increase of 77% for actin and 75% for cofilin ( p < 0.0001).

There were no significant differences with gender and there was a weak but highly significant positive correlation with age (Spearman rho = 0.205, p<0.0001).

control) and years were highly significant (treatment: df = 1; χ 2 = 22.18, P < 0.0001; year: df = 2; χ 2 = 824.73, P < 0.0001), while the interaction (treatment × year) was not significantly different (df = 2, χ 2 = 4.03, P = 0.1332).

After subtracting background fluorescence, we noticed a highly significant (p<0.0001), 2–2.5-fold decrease in mCherry fluorescence intensity at the TetO repeats on the anaphase compared with the G1-phase chromosomes ( Figure 1A, B ).

Highly significant differences between adjacent and tumor tissues were found by statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons; Figure 2 A–C).

Patterns of Elicited Fear and Post Hoc Comparisons Among Individual Snake Stimuli Friedman tests proved that the effect of the stimulus on perceived fear was highly significant in both Somali and Czech datasets ( p << 0.0001).

As shown in Table 5 , the model was highly significant, with an F -value of 30.75 and p < 0.0001, suggesting that it adequately describes the relationship between the independent variables and ZEN lactonase activity.

The quadratic model best described the data behavior; it was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and did not show a lack of fit ( p = 0.0655 > 0.05).

The Satorra–Bentler scaled χ 2 difference test was highly significant (Δχ 2 (21)= 1250, p <.0001), with ΔCFI = –.14 and ΔRMSEA = +.035, both exceeding recommended thresholds for meaningful deterioration in fit (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002; Chen, 2007).

The 19/24 published experiments with moderate, strong, or total loss of binding all showed highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ) negative contrast differences.

Both the formulation and the artificial saliva and the interaction of the two variables have a highly significant effect on all continuous rheological parameters ( p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) ( Table S2 ).

Exercise tolerance There was a highly significant variance in the exercise duration (expressed as percent compared to baseline) in the five groups (F = 93.3, P < 0.0001, Fig. 5 ).

Across the three-day measurement period, foliar application of SiNPs elicited a highly significant increase in stomatal conductance ( p < 0.0001) relative to controls under ambient UV-B ( Figure 2 a), with values of 326 ± 2.7 to 596 ± 1.5 mmol m −2 s −1 in treated leaves versus 211 ± 2.1 to 414 ± 4.4 m −2 s −1 in controls.

Pairwise distributions of the CS-h2 and CS-h4 haplotypes showed a highly significant negative correlation (Pearson r = –0.98; P < 0.0001).

Discriminant function analysis, analogous to multiple regression, confirmed these findings with a highly significant discriminant model (Wilks’ Lambda = 001, p < 0001), indicating a high proportion of explained variance (99%), making it the best discriminant model.

On comparing PACS score at discharge and follow-up between relapsed and nonrelapsed groups, the difference was highly significant at both time points ( t = 4.15, P < 0.0001 and t = 4.01, P < 0.0001, respectively).

In both species, none of the randomly generated gene sets reached or exceeded these observed proportions, resulting in highly significant outcomes (Figure S15 ) (permutation test, empirical P < 0.0001).

In Group I, glycerophospholipid metabolism exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001), and significant differences in ether lipid metabolism, vitamin digestion and absorption, and fat digestion and absorption ( p < 0.05, Figure 2 g).