“highly significant”

Differences between normal and obese subjects for insulin, CRP, adiponectin and leptin were all highly significant (p<0.0001).

Likewise, the difference between the T1/T2 and T3/T4 groups was highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Measurement error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape both reveal that the “Individual” main effect is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), which means that the variation among flowers greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Imaging” and “Digitising” ( Table 1 ).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on IC50 values yielded a highly significant difference among the synthesized derivatives ( p < 0.0001).

The difference in pCR rates between TIL-high and TIL-low patients was highly significant in univariate analysis ( P < 0.0001; OR, 6.325; 95% CI, 2.487 to 16.08; Table 2 ).

The association is strong (ODDS ratio 5.30) and statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

Temperature had a highly significant impact on the pH value of the silage feed ( p < 0.0001).

The difference in frequencies of variants within cline centre groups between the filtered (SCV only) and unfiltered datasets was highly significant (European taurine S1: Χ 2 = 13,151, df = 2; p < 0.0001; African taurine S1: Χ 2 = 17,118, df = 2; p < 0.0001), indicating an enrichment of variants with restricted gene flow and unbiased introgression.

Results remained highly significant in the linear regression model after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, smoking status, and white blood cell count (ΔTNF-α, p < 0.0001; ΔIL-6, p < 0.0001).

Our model results (see Methods for details) show that the differences between chimpanzees from Ngogo and Issa were highly significant in the δ 13 C values ( χ 2 = 61.45, df = 1, p < 0.0001) and the δ 15 N values ( χ 2 = 80.67, df = 1, p < 0.0001), with Issa chimpanzees being less depleted in 13 C, and much lower in 15 N (Fig. 2c , Table 1 ).

Using 39 samples (18 like-control and 21 like-C9), we found that the average percent insoluble hnRNP H was 69.2 in like-C9s, and 38.9 in like-control, or 1.78 times higher in like-C9, a highly significant increase in aggregated protein (p<0.0001) ( Figure 2d ; all average percent insolubility values are shown by patient in Supplementary file 1A ).

At this time point, the difference was still highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The sexual dimorphism was highly significant in this genetically diverse population (Sex: p < 0.0001, Fig. 1D , results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ) and the difference in container types contributed no significant effect on survival (Container*Sex: p = 0.12, results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ).

The inclusion of modules A, P, M, and N in the VCogM model had a highly significant impact on the model's Top‐1 Accuracy ( p ‐value < 0.0001), while module U also had a significant impact on the VCogM model's performance ( p ‐value < 0.01).

This analysis reproduced the highly significant effect of synchrony (F 1,145.96 = 34.9, p < 0.0001) already found in the 2 × 2 type B model.

The Kruskal–Wallis tests revealed highly significant differences among the four groups (Control, Group 1, Run 2, and Group 2) for all three isotopes (δ 13 C, δ 15 N, and δ 34 S; p < 0.0001 for all).

We found a highly significant positive correlation between nuclear ERβ and ovarian cancer marker CEA ( p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1598–0.4465) (Table 4 ).

There was a highly significant difference between the EFG and CG with p = 0.0001 ( p < 0.01).

While subsets of the neuronal population showed increases or decreases in activity, the overall population showed a 26% increase in mean firing rate, which was highly significant with t -test p < 0.0001 ( Figure 4f ).

There was a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001, correlation coefficient = 0.62) between the two scores.

Although these increases were highly significant (ANOVA: F 25,429 = 1434, p < 0.0001; F 13,95 = 13.64, p < 0.0001), they were really small (see Supporting Information Tables S4 and S5 ) in units of percent (females vs. males) both in WT and KO animals. 3.3.

The difference between HR on admission, 12 h and 24 hours was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Correlation of depression as per BDI with Self-esteem (RSES) and body image disturbances (BICI) A highly significant negative correlation of depression with self-esteem ( r = -0.678, P < 0.0001) and a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.6395, P < 0.0001) with body image disturbances was seen in our sample of CD [ Table 5 ].

All correlations coefficients shown in Additional file 1 : Table S1, Additional file 2 : Table S2 and Additional file 3 : Table S3 were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis by One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant seasonal effect on the anti-inflammatory activity of R. officinalis essential oils ( p < 0.0001).