Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
}}\, + \,{1}.{75}*{\text{B}}*{\text{C}} - {6}*{\text{A}}^{{2}} - {6}*{\text{ B}}^{{2}} - {3}*{\text{C}}^{{2}}$$\end{document} RNA content = 183.89 + 0.69 ∗ A - 0.98 ∗ B + 0.22 ∗ C + 2.25 ∗ A ∗ B - 0.25 ∗ A ∗ C + 1.75 ∗ B ∗ C - 6 ∗ A 2 - 6 ∗ B 2 - 3 ∗ C 2 ANOVA revealed that the regression model was highly significant, F-value (16.45, P < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The increases in insoluble Aβ42 and Aβ40 in CatD-KO relative to WT controls were highly significant at all ages, both in terms of pairwise comparisons between age-matched groups (Fig. 2 a, b) and when analyzed by ANOVA using a mixed-effects model ( p < 0.0001 for age, genotype, and age × genotype for both Aβ42 and Aβ40).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the effects of the main independent variables were highly significant among treatments (χ 2 = 3312.6, df = 3, P < 0.0001) and the duration of exposure to the fungus (χ 2 = 376.4, df = 4, P < 0.01).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our results indicated that while alpha-tocopherol exerted no significant effect on EGFR expression in the evaginated protoscoleces, highly significant difference in EGFR expression was observed in the in vitro segmented worms ( P <0.0001, Fig. 2a ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Under Eligibility Criteria, inclusion criteria were reported in 80% of public summaries and 100% of GAI summaries ( p = 0.11), whereas exclusion criteria were completely absent in the public summaries (0%) but present in all GAI-generated ones (100%), representing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the original validation study by McCreight et al., this questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability and validity: it showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.8), good test-retest reliability, and significant discriminant validity, with a highly significant difference in total scores between metformin-intolerant and metformin-tolerant patients ( P < 0.0001) ( McCreight et al., 2018 ).