Second, the retrospective evaluation of 1292 consecutive patients who underwent deltoid muscle biopsy for diagnostic purposes showed a highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) between chronic myalgias and the presence of MMF at biopsy ( 2 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Data mining – untargeted correlations There were a number of unpredicted and highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ) correlations between Biodex measures of muscle strength and intramuscular pH.
The differences were statistically highly significant ( χ 2 = 1689.11, P < 0.0001).
A primary finding is the highly significant coordination between thorn density and thorn angle ( p < 0.0001).
Three days following sepsis the two models had an inverse correlation that was highly significant (p<0.0001) with an r = −0.284 ( Figure 4C ).
A 3 × 3 within participants ANOVA of list type and the serial position of the critical word, revealed a highly significant main effect of list type: F (2, 106) = 20.458, MSe = 0.008235, p < 0.0001, highly significant main effect of critical word serial position: F (2, 106) = 23.926, MSe = 0.006552, p < 0.0001, and most importantly, a highly significant interaction between the two factors: F (4, 212) = 5.880, MSe = 0.005438, p < 0.0001.
When examining intra-individual change for the entire sample of participants ( n = 42) that completed the hula program, there was a highly significant outcome on total physical activity ( p < 0.0001), moderate exercise ( p < 0 0.0001), and mild exercise ( p < 0.0001).
This effect was even more pronounced at 6%, which exhibited the lowest activity level and a highly significant difference compared to all other groups ( p < 0.0001).
In all the mechanical properties tested, a highly significant difference was observed in the mean values between and within the groups ( p < 0.0001).
We found a highly significant correlation between the F ST values of the paired loci (correlation coefficient = 0.3288, P < 0.0001).
Turkish studies consistently confirmed the association of ARMS2 A69S variant with AMD risk, with odds ratios ranging from 3.0 to 8.56 (95% CI: 1.23–20.83) and p values ≤ 0.008, including highly significant results (p < 0.0001).
Their Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant relationship (r = 0.942, p < 0.0001), with no differences between sex genders.
However, there was a highly significant increase in DHE-positive cells in cells treated with 7KC and 7β-OH (62.5 μM) compared to the control, vehicles, α-tocopherol, and oils ( p <0.0001).
Increases in growth velocity were highly significant for participants with a baseline growth velocity <5 cm/year (n = 14, p < 0.0001) but were not significant for those whose baseline growth velocity was above this cut-off (n = 10, p = 0.13).
Similarly, the difference in a mean reduction in Y-BOCS scores was also highly significant at p=0.0001 (t=12.857, r=0.803; t=11.488, r=0.803 in men and women, respectively).
ANOVA The one-way ANOVA in supplementary Table 8 revealed a highly significant effect of solvent composition on Arsenic recovery (F(3, 8) = 268.3, p < 0.0001).
The test showed a highly significant result for the severity variable in the model ( Χ 2 = 1989.9; p ≤ 0.0001).
The coefficient ρ, which measures the correlation between the error terms of the two regressions that we jointly estimated in the analysis, was negative (−0.292) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
To investigate this, we conducted a Chi-square test, which revealed a highly significant difference ( P < .0001).
The UV-induced gene expression changes in wt and xpa-1 mutants showed a highly significant positive correlation (Spearman r=0.89; p<0.0001), indicating that the transcriptional response depended on UV-induced DNA lesions ( Suppl.
The stratum × crop interaction was highly significant (χ2 = 32.44, p < 0.0001), indicating that vertical distribution patterns depend on the host crop, while no interactions involving technique were significant.
Furthermore, the 200 mg/kg BW dose resulted in an even more pronounced elevation in serum iron levels, with a highly significant difference compared to the control group (p-value <0.0001).
According Table 2 , U-Net and DeepLabV3Plus achieved highly significant improvements ( p < 0.0001) with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d > 0.56), indicating substantial practical significance.
Multiple regression analysis of the experimental data yielded the following second-order polynomial equation (Equation (1)), which describes the relationship between the response variable and the independent variables: (1) Oil yield (%) = 33.84 + 0.5783A + 0.8342B + 0.4008C + 0.8633D + 0.5550AB + 0.2425AC + 0.1675AD + 0.6150BC − 0.2725BD + 0.2550CD − 2.08A 2 − 1.31B 2 − 2.09C 2 − 1.32D 2 As shown in Table 3 , the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit test was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model is statistically valid and well-fitted to the experimental data.
All the models were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as indicated by the cross-validated analysis of variance (ANOVA) diagnostic on the residuals of the regression between cross-validated scores of the predictive O-PLS component and the response in terms of the antioxidant activities.