“highly significant”

Intraclass correlation analysis for somatic signs showed an estimate for heritability of 0.668 in mecamylamine treated animals and 0.318 in saline treated mice, consistent with the highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in somatic signs caused by mecamylamine treatment of nicotine‐exposed mice (11.82) versus saline treatment (3.24).

Similarly, the comparison between 2020 and 2023 showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).

The difference between two groups is statistical highly significant; p<0.0001.

In a repeated measures ANOVA analysis this was highly significant ( P <0.0001) for a genotype effect on lean mass in grams in males and females ( Fig. 3B and Table 2 ).

Statistical analysis results ( Table 3 ) Highly significant association resulted statistically for Plaque Urease / Gastric urease (chi-squared = 42.629), which correspond to (P<0.0001).

Differences between the two groups were highly significant (p<0.0001; unpaired T-test with Welch's correction), reflecting the recent and remote diversification histories of acute and chronic sequences, respectively.

This was highly significant but represented only 0.55% of explained variance ( χ 2 ( df = 1, n = 4723) = 25.60, p < 0.0001, φ = 0.074).

When the areas of H-reflexes (averaged daily) elicited by single and burst stimuli were compared these differences were highly significant ( Sign and Wilcoxon tests, P<0.0001) indicating that burst stimulation attenuated by about 50% the area of H-reflexes elicited by single pulses.

This confirms the ANOVA test, where the two interaction factors (AB) were found to be highly significant (P < 0.0001).

This demonstrated a highly significant decrease in the early survival of Tcf12 ra/ra ( Supplementary Table S3 ; P < 0.0001).

Fly sex was a highly significant predictor of mass, aligning with previously observed sexual dimorphism (df = 89, F = 100.1, P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.42–0.62).

bryosalmonae in Water A highly significant treatment effect was observed ( F 3;16 = 33.05, p < 0.0001), indicating that Tb eDNA concentration in water was significantly higher in treatments involving trout compared to those without, suggesting active spore release via urine (Figure 2 , Table 1 , Figure S1 ).

The average thickness, for example, shows the expected highly significant difference using our method ( p < 0.0001 ), but not for CCSeg ( p ≈ 0.42 ) using the same statistical model as above.

The differences where highly significant in the Wilcoxon test (z = -3,79; p < 0,0001).

Evaluation of Confidence Levels On comparing the confidence levels of participants before and after the training with the t-test, there was a highly significant improvement with p-value < 0.0001 across all nine aspects as depicted in Figure 2 .

The greatest mean IOP change was found in Group A, with a highly significant mean IOP change of -7.4 ± 3.8 mmHg (-29.7%) at week 1, -8.0 ± 3.3 mmHg (-32.0%) at month 1, and -8.0 ± 3.7 mmHg (-32.0%) at month 3 (all P < 0.0001 compared with baseline).

We observed a highly significant difference (p value = 0.0001) between patients’ antibody response to P3/FUR/x3 based on their disease status.

Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant positive correlation between IGS size and 45S rDNA consensus length (Spearman’s ρ = 0.937, p < 0.0001), providing strong evidence that IGS expansion may be the primary driver of variation in 45S rDNA unit length across Characiformes species.

The analysis revealed a highly significant difference in symptom severity distribution (χ2 = 18.13, p = 0.0001, and degrees of freedom = 2).

The results ( Table 2 ) showed a highly significant ( p = 0.0001) decrease in the total lignin content, from 19.67% (raw biomass) to 6.68% (4% NaOH-pretreated biomass), representing approximately 87% lignin removal ( Figure 1 ).

The model showed that chromosome identity had a highly significant effect on pairing success ( P < 0.0001), indicating consistent interchromosomal differences in pairing likelihood.

There were highly significant effects of three of the four individual variables on epitope-specific endpoint titers (p<0.0001); the only individual variable not having a significant effect on antigen endpoints was the geographic origin of the sera (p = 0.0709).

Statistical analysis of the curves summarized in Figure 2 was done using Prism 5 Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and the difference between the mutant and wild-type curves was highly significant in all cases with a p-value<0.0001.

The mean difference of 8.73 was found to be statistically highly significant (P<0.0001).

The proliferation rate was found to be decreased and a highly significant decrease in proliferation was observed at 100 nM treatment ( P < 0.0001) in comparison to lower doses and control ( Figure 2(b) ). 3.3.