“highly significant”

Due to the supplemental intravenous analgesia in younger patients, this did not manifest as a reduction of NRS scores, but in the highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decline of the proportion of cases in which methoxyflurane therapy was stopped because of insufficient analgesia.

When it comes to lRFS the Rome classification showed highly significant predictive value (p<0.0001 both at Log-Rank and Wilcoxon) with a notable progressively lower local control for each increasing T stage.

Statistical analysis of mortalities against alphacypermethrin between the sprayed group (A) and the no spray group (C) was highly significant (chi sq. = 15.36, p < 0.0001) and with the DDT sprayed group (B) (chi.

Change in UCVA in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution from preoperative value to every follow-up postoperatively was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in both the groups [ Figure 2 ].

In our study, rs9939609 also showed highly significant association with waist circumference in both NHS98 Chinese ( P < 0.0001) and NHS98 Malay ( P = 0.001); waist circumference data were not available for SiMES Malays.

Log-rank analysis of the all-cause morbidity in DIZE-treated males compared to vehicle control was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Additionally, the model reached a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001), and the lack of fit of this model is insignificant ( p > 0.05).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated excellent model fit for the crude enzyme system, with a determination coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.9878, adjusted R 2 of 0.9721, and a highly significant model F-value of 62.93 ( p < 0.0001), as detailed in Table S2 .

Single bean gum application decreased HPV viral load in untreated salivary samples 86–95% and results were highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

Specifically, Table 2 highlights the highly significant impact ( p < 0.0001) of yeast extract concentration (Factor B) and several interaction terms (AB, AC, BC) on HA yield.

2 , highly significant correlations ( P < 0.0001 for all markers) were observed for ER (tumor R = 0.76), Ki‐67 (tumor R = 0.41), CD4 (tumor R = 0.34, stroma R = 0.52), and CD8 (tumor R = 0.48, stroma R = 0.56).

Highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) was found between the cognitive functions of the schizophrenia group and healthy control.

On both primary outcome days (Day 4 and Day 7), these rate differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating clinically meaningful effects.

These differences were highly significant for both wild type and Atxn2 ko mice (ANOVA with repeated measure, P<0.0001).

The correlation between MMP-8 and sTREM-1 by the Spearman rank test was highly significant ( r = 0.8640, p < 0.0001; Figure 4 C).

The Shapiro–Wilk test indicated a nonparametric distribution of the dataset ( p < 0.0001), whereas the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to test for potential differences regarding the overall ISR of AUBB and the individual sub-entities and indicated a highly significant difference between the overall ISR of AUBB and all established sub-entities ( p < 0.0001; Table 4 ).

officinalis phospholipids showed a robust and highly significant reduction in scores, decreasing −26.4% after week 3 ( P < 0.0001 vs. baseline).

All primary breast cancers showed a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001) in FI compared to the surrounding normal mammary tissue ( Figure 1 ).

While the mean DR of [ 18 F]AlF-OC was not high enough to be significantly superior to [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, it was highly significant for non-inferiority testing ( p = 0.0001).

Second, we explored regulations of serum protein levels over time, which revealed 34 highly significant positively and 39 highly negatively correlated proteins ( P ‐value < 10 −4 ; Fig 3C , Dataset EV6 ).

The analysis of variance of the response surface quadratic regression model showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a high F-value of 32.31.

The Y 1 regression model had a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) effect on the primary term B, a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on A, C, AC., and B.C., and a non-significant ( p > 0.05) effect on AB., A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 .

A strong and highly significant concordance was found between the two primer/probe sets ( N =30, Spearman ρ =0.9985, P <0.0001).

The active fraction’s ability to reduce the duration of immobility was assessed, and the difference was highly significant compared with that of the control ( p < 0.0001; n = 6).

CFR among partially vaccinated is four times more than the CFR in unvaccinated, and the difference is statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).