“highly significant”

ANOVA revealed highly significant CN variation among the taxa ( F = 44.649, d.f. = 5, p = 0.0000).

3 a) for volumes assessed by the two readers, however, the ICC was 0.836 which was “good” and highly significant (95% CI 0.616–0.930, P = 0.000).

Regarding descriptive statistics for these results, the F test of one-way ANOVA shows a highly significant difference in surface roughness ( P -value = 0.000) among the five groups (C1, C2, P3, P5, and P7), as shown in Table 3 .

AMOVA analysis including all samples revealed highly significant structures among them ( F ST = 0.081; P = 0.00000 ± 0.0000) (Table 4 ).

The likelihood ratio test of rho is highly significant ( p value = 0.000), suggesting that a multivariate probit specification fits the data well.

One-way ANOVA test showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p <0.000) and there were no significant differences in FS between the Cons vs Trad access cavity designs in class I and class II cavities, respectively.

There are also highly significant interactions between the species and the chemical compound (F 1, 133 = 26.3, p < 0), species and storage (F 1, 133 = 19.2, p < 0), compound and storage (F 1, 133 = 52.4, p < 0) and between species and plant part (F 1, 133 = 2.9, p < 0.05).

Two-way ANOVA (Table 1 ) indicated no significant lung effect (P = 0.303), a highly significant treatment effect (P = 0.000), and a non-significant interaction effect (P = 0.067).

Very highly significant (P<0.000) The sample size was calculated according to a pre-established formula: N = population size e = Margin of error (percentage in decimal form) Z = Z-score (desired confidence level, 95%: z score = 1.96) The estimated sample size required to achieve a precision of ±0.05% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was 450 females.

Overall mean knowledge score gain of security officers regarding COVID19 infection was from 6.69 ± 1.27 to 8.38 ± 1.35, which was highly significant ( P = 0.000).

However, the association between ACE/ARB use and COVID-19 infection remained highly significant after adjusting for the propensity score and these variables (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48–0.87, p = 0.00) ( S3 Table ).

Results: The mean salivary cortisol level of the RAS group showed a very highly significant difference ( P = 0.000) from the controls.

Two-way ANOVA revealed that doses, time, and dose and time interaction were highly significant ( p = 0.000) ( Table 4 ).

RESULTS Table 1 depicts a statistically highly significant reduction in GI, PI, and PPD with P < 0.000 in all the parameters in all the groups.

Here again, highly significant differences ( p = 0.000) and moderate effect size ( d = 0.66), although slightly higher than BS, are found.

The corresponding coefficients in the mothers were lower, but still highly significant ( p < 0.000 1 ).

The test for Slc2a9 was highly significant (2Δ Lnl = 51.4, df = 1, p = 0, Table 5 ), indicating enhanced selection in P. eremicus relative to the other lineages.

control comparison was highly significant (p = 0), which indicates a common transcriptomic response in these two MDS subtypes.

Results The difference in the caries prevalence between the age groups and between the socioeconomic level was very highly significant (p = 0.000).

Highly significant differences (p = 0.00) between the index of substitution saturation (Iss) and the critical Iss (Iss.c) were observed for all alignments and site types other than ITS when examining all sites and treating gaps as unknown nucleotides (in which case p = 0.54).

In the present study, we found a highly significant correlation (rho, 0.498; p = 0.000) between total IgE levels in serum and sputum in our overall sample, a finding that is consistent with the results described by Manise et al. in asthmatic patients[ 28 ].

The association between mothers’ Vit-D3 and newborn UCB Vit-D3 was highly significant (R=0.744; P =0.000), indicating a direct dependence of the newborn’s Vit-D3 on the mother’s Vit-D3 sources.

The result proved highly significant (p = 0.0000) (Table 1 ).

The average Heidelberg Short Early Risk Assessment Questionnaire (HKF-R10) was reduced from 83.792 to 69.391 until the patient was discharged and the P value is highly significant ( t test, P < .000), equaling a statistically detectable change over time ( Table 4 ; Figure 4 ).

The results in Table 6 indicate that all factors and interaction effects are highly significant ( p < 0.000) except for V 2 *V 2 with p < 0.005.