“highly significant”

These differences were highly significant (χ 2 = 119, p < 10 -5 ), suggesting that the proportion of asymmetric genes is not at random and affected by natural selection.

12/15 studies (80%) reported significantly higher CXCL10 levels in vitiligo patients compared to controls, resulting in an overall highly significant CXCL10 concentration in the blood of vitiligo patients (P < 0.00001) ( 13 – 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 – 28 ).

Not surprisingly, the effect of motion direction was highly significant (t(17)=21, p<10 -5 ).

The overall effect was highly significant ( Z = 4.78, p < 0.00001) ( Fig. 2 ). 3.3.

(b) The effect size (SMD) of the sadness and anger stimuli was 0.86 and 0.98, respectively, with that of the sadness stimuli being significant ( P = 0.02) and that of anger stimuli being highly significant ( P < 0.00001).

These 27 Arabidopsis proteins ( Table 1 ) represent a highly significant (p<1e −5 ) enrichment for the gene ontology GO categories of phosphorus metabolic processes, protein metabolic process, cellular macromolecular metabolic process and biopolymer metabolic process.

An unpaired Student's t -test demonstrated that both combination treatments were significantly different to the appropriate controls, which resulted in an overall highly significant one-way ANOVA test ( P <0.00001).

The ICI and WI showed a strong and highly significant correlation (r = 0.53141, p < 0.00001).

CloneCNA accurately estimates the cellularity with highly significant positive correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.99, p < 1×10 −5 , and mean absolute error < 0.03) with the ground truth cellularity across all mixed samples (Additional file 2 : Figure S6), indicating CloneCNA can precisely reproduce clonal components.

The results indicated that the assumption that, for all the cytokines evaluated, irradiation with Fe ions causes an increase in the levels of each of the cytokine evaluated that is highly significant (p value < 0,00001).

The pooled estimated prevalence from the nine included studies was approximately 52% (95% CI: 44 to 59%), with a highly significant effect ( p < 0.00001) and heterogeneity (I 2 = 99%).

The chromatic differences between guppies and backgrounds (ΔS) are all highly significant ( p < 0.00001) for both light environments ( FS and OC , Table 3 and Figure S12 ), with ΔS >>1 ( Table 3 and Figure S11 ), indicating strong chromatic contrast between guppies and both spacelight and substrates.

The results of the study concluded that HA alone or in combination with other materials was effective for the treatment of peri-implantitis, as the meta-analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference favouring the HA-treated group over the control group ( p = 0.00001).

After adjusting for sex, age, and race/ethnicity in Model I, the negative association remained highly significant (β = −0.038, 95% CI: −0.045 to −0.031, p < 0.00001).

The linear-regression analysis between the number of CAG repeats in the expanded allele and age at onset was highly significant ( p < 0.00001).

The strikingly different microsatellite distribution in isolates carrying a resistant or a sensitive haplotype was highly significant (chi-square test P < 0.00001).

For example, if one gene is repressed by 1.8-fold, the statistical significance may not be very high, but if all 78 cRPGs are repressed to a similar degree with an average of 1.8-fold, 1.8-fold becomes highly significant (P-value < 0.00001 when compared to background genes).

A total of 259 highly significant ( P ≤ 1 × 10 –5 ) marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified for seven phenotypic traits.

A new repeated measures ANOVA excluding the local recombination estimates for SNPs with MAF < 0.1 was applied and the differences in recombination rates between the groups remained highly significant ( P < 0.00001).

Figure 7 a shows the relationship between LAI r and LAI-vc e by applying method (ii) with k r obtained by inverting Equation (7), which rendered highly significant statistical analysis ( Table 4 ) as expected ( R 2 = 0.94; b = 0.98; SEE = 0.71; RMSE = 0.15; p < 0.00001).

The combined effect SMD was 2.64 (95% CI: 2.38, 2.90), indicating a highly significant difference (P < 0.00001).

Results remained highly significant when excluding the cross-fostered bats ( n = 11), which were only tested in year 3 ( P < 0.00001; learning : 0.19±17 vs. 0.45 ±0.19 error rates, respectively, R 2 =0.72, p < 0.00001, mixed GLM with learning set as the response variable, the origin as a fixed factor and the bat’s ID as a random effect, n = 65).

They found a highly significant difference in mean %EWL of 17.98% (95%CI: 8.37-27.58, P < 0.00001) in the balloon group in comparison to the sham/life-style modification group.

A result was designed highly significant if p < 0.00001.

5 C, D indicated that the correlation between estimated and ground-truth EC was highly significant ( p < 1e-5) for low NSR (NSR < 0.3) and remained significant ( p < 0.005) even for large NSR (NSR ≥ 0.3).