“highly significant”

The results revealed a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000) with χ 2 (1, N = 453) = 90.644.

A comparison of laboratory parameters between pre- and post-transplant of ABO-match and mismatch groups showed a highly significant association with hemoglobin, platelet counts, total leukocyte counts, and total bilirubin respectively (p=0.000).

The ROC derived from the prediction model yielded an area under the curve of 0.70, slightly higher than the ROC of the 10th percentile cut-off. Discussion The association between blink rate and DIP and UPDRS score in patients with SMI is highly significant ( p < 0.000).

At all-time points (days 1–7, 14, and 21), the difference in fluoride release between F3 and F4 remained highly significant ( p = 0.000).

The positive correlation between DNMT1 and Survivin was highly significant in both tumors ( r = 0.919, P = 0.000) and normal tissues ( r = 0.983, P = 0.000) (Figure 10E ).

For the PCD tool, spindle speed emerged as the dominant factor affecting surface finish, with a highly significant P-value ( p = 0.000), highlighting the critical role of cutting speed in achieving ultra-smooth surfaces in graphite-reinforced composites.

A highly significant association (p-value=0.000) was found between IBS and conditions such as GAD, depression, and psychological symptoms, including irritability, excessive worry about daily tasks, and difficulty relaxing.

On comparing the expression of Gal-1 score with the nodal status of OSCC, we observed that the mean Gal-1 score increased with regional lymph node involvement (N0 = 2.63, N = 3.31) and it was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.000) [ Table 1 and Figure 1 ].

Clinicopathologic parameters like age, sex, histologic type, perineural, and lymphovascular invasion were compared and correlated with EGFR and HER-2/NEU status. Results Expression of EGFR was found in 93.33% of cases, which showed a highly significant correlation with histological tumor type ( p = 0.000).

Regarding descriptive statistics for these results, the F test of one-way ANOVA shows a highly significant difference in surface roughness ( P -value = 0.000) among the five groups (C1, C2, P3, P5, and P7), as shown in Table 3 .

The linear and square terms of both the regression models for CMCase activity and cell growth were found to be highly significant at P = 0.000.

morrilli populations Exact tests (simultaneous analysis) for population differentiation indicated that highly significant differences in marker frequencies existed among the G. morrilli populations ( χ 2 = 400.8; df = 50; P = 0.0000) (Table 1) .

Regarding the effect of age, higher mean co-morbidities is noticed with advancing age and a statistical significant difference is present (F = 5.7, P = 0.003) also there is a highly significant direct correlation between number of co-morbidity and advance age (r = 0.120, P = 0.000).

The result was highly significant (P = 0.00) suggesting well fitness of the model.

In our study, it was found that participants with longer mandibular length had a low percentage of impaction as compared to those with short mandibular length, and this difference was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.00) on overall basis as well as in males and females separately.

There was a highly significant (p = 0.000) difference in the incidence and severity of the disease among the different age groups of the plantations ( Table 9 ).

Both of these changes were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000).

congolense Mikese compared to negative control was highly significant ( P = 0.000).

A highly significant reduction of β-catenin expression was achieved with SB77 treatment as compared to control (p = 0.000); however, it was not found to be statistically significant when compared with Y27632 (Fig. 6 ; p = 0.088).

The analyses performed using the Mann–Kendall test for the proportion of TB/HIV coinfection among men ( Figure 13 a,b) revealed a highly significant upward trend ( p < 0.000).

Highly significant differences in AUDPC values ( p = 0.00) were observed for the treatments, with disease progression monitored weekly.

Furthermore, the difference between the total mean scores is statistically highly significant, with the experimental group (mean score 12.12 ± 2.07) scoring better than the control group (mean score 10.49 ± 1.71, P = 0.000).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) between all the extracts showed a very highly significant difference ( p -value = 0).

These differences are highly significant (Z-test p = 0).

Following correction for primary tumour location, metastatic status, age and gender, the difference between patient groups with and without cachexia diagnosis according to Fearon et al becomes more significant (p=00 055 instead of p=00 338) and the difference according to Evans et al remains highly significant (p<00 001; figure 2 A, B).