“highly significant”

When FGFR mutation was used as predictor, highly significant results were found for hemispheric LI prediction ( p = 0) for all tumor grades.

statistically highly significant ((p <0, 001).

intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).

The highly significant results of the omnibus models ( p < 0.000) indicate that these associations are highly unlikely to have occurred by chance.

Regarding metabolic biomarkers, highly significant lower insulin (pmol/l) (β=-4.2, 95% CI [-6.4 to -2.0], p < 0.000) and leptin (ng/ml) (β=-0.56, 95% CI [-0.97 to -0.15], p = 0.008) levels were associated with more steps after six months.

The statistical methods assumed a significance level of p < 0.05 and a highly significant level of p < 0.00.

For the right side localization, main effect was highly significant F (1, 28) = 116.26 P = 0.000, partial eta squared = 0.806, non-verbal belief processing showed slight increase compared to the robust improvement observed in verbal processing (mean 1 = 0.028 and mean 2 = 2.142).

We conducted an assessment of sleep duration changes among our participants and identified a highly significant difference (p = 0.000).

There was highly significant association between duration of operation and management options, p=.000.

There is a statistically significant association between performing BSE in the correct way and discovering BC, with a highly significant p value of 0.000 as indicated by the Pearson's chi‐square test ( p = 0.000) (Table 5 ).

There was a highly significant difference between the high and low fluoride blocks and enamel fluorosis ( P = 0.00).

BGDR reported highly significant coefficients for MA(1) = −0.9986 ( p = 0.000) and seasonal MA(1) = −0.9637 ( p = 0.000), with AIC = 13232.4, BIC = 13257.7, and residual diagnostics showing no autocorrelation (Ljung–Box p = 0.94) and no heteroskedasticity ( p = 0.40).

ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of cement content on UCS ( p = 0.000), confirming that strength development is strongly dependent on binder proportion.

The mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the CAF + XCM group (36.23 ± 9.21 min) compared to the CAF + CTG group (52.13 ± 12.16 min), with a highly significant p-value (p = 0.000).

A statistical highly significant association ( p =0.000) was found between the age of the patients and the vertical position of impacted canines ( Table 2 ).

Reproduction and population growth parameters The effect of temperature was highly significant for the different reproductive parameters including gross ( F = 11.41; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 14.405; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fecundity rates, gross ( F = 15.82; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 17.51; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fertility rates, mean eggs per day ( F = 10.66; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and mean fertile eggs per day ( F = 13.15; df = 4; P value = 0.00) ( Table 1 ).

Although the overall regression is highly significant (p = 0.000, n = 60), the 7 variables just account for 36% (R 2 ) of the total variance.

A highly significant difference (Figure 9a ) was measured between postprandial blood sugar levels after consuming both control and intervention recipes ( p = .000).

Significant differences were also observed across multiple subscales, with a highly significant difference in sleep duration between the JIA group and the control group ( p = 0.000), as well as significant differences in sleep anxiety ( p = 0.046), night awakenings ( p = 0.002), abnormal sleep patterns ( p = 0.003), sleep breathing disorders ( p = 0.000), and daytime sleepiness ( p = 0.007).

An effect of roughage was noted on the pH24, pH48, and b*, with highly significant interactions between factors noted for pH24 (P< 0.000), and b* (P< 0.000).

Also, the risk increased to twice among children consuming junk food more than once a day (OR: 2; 95% CI = 1.30–3.08).[ 45 ] Among participants belonging to the overweight and obese category, 12% of the total were found to prefer fast food and results were found to be highly significant at X2 = 45.23 with P < 0.000, whereas 13.33% were reported as binge eaters (X2 = 68.63 with P < 0.000; highly significant).[ 46 ] Family history of obesity Findings from a study to document the prevalence of overweight and obesity among school children of an affluent school suggested a higher incid

The analysis suggested that the overall model was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.00).

The statistical analysis revealed highly significant disparities in the staining rates of β -cat and N-cad across all three regions ( p < 0.000, p < 0.000, p < 0.000, respectively).

One-way ANOVA results were highly significant: size exponent ( F = 175.34, p = 0.0000) and duration exponent ( F = 200.08, p = 0.0000), indicating a systematic shift in avalanche dynamics with increasing sleep depth.

It shows association between SES and psychological symptoms and also highly significant ( P = 0.000).